Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1988;11:427-432

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mills, E.
Right arrow Articles by Bruckert, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mills, E.
Right arrow Articles by Bruckert, J. W.

Hypertension, Vol 11, 427-432, Copyright © 1988 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Pressor mechanisms linked obligatorily to spontaneous hypertension in the rat

E Mills and JW Bruckert
Department of Pharmacology, Duke University Medical School, Durham, North Carolina.

To identify genetic factors linked obligatorily to hypertension in the rat, pithed spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) were compared with genetically similar (Wistar-Kyoto rats; WKY) and different (Sprague- Dawley) normotensive strains. The only variables that distinguished SHR from both WKY and Sprague-Dawley rats were a greater maximum pressor response to electrical stimulation of sympathetic outflow and decreased sensitivity to submaximal doses of the alpha 1-adrenergic agonist methoxamine (i.e., higher ED50). SHR had in common with Sprague-Dawley rats basal blood pressure after pithing plus adrenalectomy and the maximum pressor response to methoxamine; both these values were higher than those in WKY. All strains demonstrated equal sensitivity of the vasoconstrictor response to endogenous norepinephrine released by electrical simulation at submaximal frequency, even though sensitivity to the alpha 1-adrenergic receptor agonist was lower in SHR. The alpha 2-adrenergic receptor antagonist rauwolscine attenuated the pressor response to electrical stimulation in SHR and WKY but increased it in Sprague-Dawley rats. The alpha 1-adrenergic receptor antagonist prazosin attenuated the response more in SHR and WKY than in Sprague- Dawley rats. We conclude that 1) sympathetic hyperactivity is linked obligatorily to hypertension in SHR; 2) increased basal blood pressure and noradrenergic vasoconstrictor response are present in SHR, but they are not obligatorily linked to hypertension; 3) feedback inhibition of norepinephrine release is comparable in SHR or WKY and poorly developed compared with that in Sprague-Dawley rats; 4) decreased sensitivity of the pressor response to stimulation of vascular alpha 1-adrenergic receptors in SHR compensates partially for increased sympathetic activity or hyperinnervation, or both.