Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1988;12:443-449

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Donnelly, R.
Right arrow Articles by Reid, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Donnelly, R.
Right arrow Articles by Reid, J. L.

Hypertension, Vol 12, 443-449, Copyright © 1988 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Nifedipine: individual responses and concentration-effect relationships

R Donnelly, HL Elliott, PA Meredith, AW Kelman and JL Reid
University Department of Materia Medica, Stobhill General Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Dynamic and kinetic variability account for the large intersubject differences in the antihypertensive response to nifedipine, and a clear concentration-effect relationship has not been established. The effects of placebo, first dose, and chronic (1 and 6 weeks) treatment with nifedipine were studied in 14 subjects with essential hypertension using an integrated kinetic-dynamic model to calculate individual subject responsiveness in terms of fall in blood pressure per unit change in drug concentration. Nifedipine concentrations were well correlated with the fall in systolic blood pressure in individual subjects, and the mean responsiveness was -0.48 mm Hg/ng/ml after the first dose, -0.45 mm Hg/ng/ml after 1 week, and -0.49 mm Hg/ng/ml after 6 weeks. The responsiveness to the first dose of nifedipine was significantly correlated with the responsiveness after 1 (r = 0.83) and 6 weeks (r = 0.78) of therapy and with the height of the pretreatment blood pressure (r = 0.6). This study incorporated kinetic as well as dynamic information to characterize the antihypertensive response to nifedipine and identify nifedipine concentration-effect relationships in individual hypertensive subjects.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
N. Nishikawa, T. Masuyama, K. Yamamoto, Y. Sakata, T. Mano, T. Miwa, M. Sugawara, and M. Hori
Long-term administration of amlodipine prevents decompensation to diastolic heart failure in hypertensive rats
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 2001; 38(5): 1539 - 1545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
T. Yamazaki, I. Komuro, Y. Zou, S. Kudoh, I. Shiojima, T. Mizuno, Y. Hiroi, R. Nagai, and Y. Yazaki
Efficient Inhibition of the Development of Cardiac Remodeling by a Long-Acting Calcium Antagonist Amlodipine
Hypertension, January 1, 1998; 31(1): 32 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text]