Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1990;15:204-209

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, T.
Right arrow Articles by Zimmerman, B. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, T.
Right arrow Articles by Zimmerman, B. G.

Hypertension, Vol 15, 204-209, Copyright © 1990 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

In vivo comparison of renal and femoral vascular sensitivity and local angiotensin generation

T Li and BG Zimmerman
Department of Pharmacology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455.

Experiments were conducted to compare the relative importance of the local renin-angiotensin systems in the rabbit renal and femoral vascular beds and their functional role in hemodynamic regulation. Angiotensin I (Ang I) (0.15 microgram/kg i.v.) elevated mean arterial blood pressure by 18 +/- 1 mm Hg in the renal experimental group and 19 +/- 1 mm Hg in the femoral experimental group; it decreased renal blood flow by 35 +/- 3% but increased femoral blood flow by 31 +/- 8%. All these effects were blocked by intravenous administration of captopril (2 mg/kg bolus injection plus 1 mg/kg/hr). Captopril also lowered mean arterial pressure by 17 +/- 3 and 16 +/- 2 mm Hg in the renal and femoral experimental groups, respectively, and it increased renal blood flow by 32 +/- 10% but reduced femoral blood flow by 21 +/- 4%. As a result, renal vascular resistance was decreased by 36 +/- 5%, but femoral vascular resistance remained unchanged. After captopril, plasma angiotensin II (Ang II) levels were decreased and Ang I levels increased in the two groups. The renal venous-arterial difference of Ang I was increased by captopril, but the femoral venous-arterial difference of Ang I was not, suggesting greater generation of Ang I in the kidney. In a separate group of bilateral nephrectomized rabbits, plasma Ang II levels as well as mean arterial pressure, femoral blood flow, and femoral vascular resistance were not changed by intravenous administration of captopril.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
D. FLISER, R. DIKOW, S. DEMUKAJ, and E. RITZ
Opposing Effects of Angiotensin II on Muscle and Renal Blood Flow under Euglycemic Conditions
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2000; 11(11): 2001 - 2006.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
S. Yasuda and W. Y. W. Lew
Angiotensin II exacerbates lipopolysaccharide-induced contractile depression in rabbit cardiac myocytes
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 1999; 276(5): H1442 - H1449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
D. Fliser, F. Schaefer, D. Schmid, J. D. Veldhuis, and E. Ritz
Angiotensin II Affects Basal, Pulsatile, and Glucose-Stimulated Insulin Secretion in Humans
Hypertension, November 1, 1997; 30(5): 1156 - 1161.
[Abstract] [Full Text]