Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1990;16:555-563

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Admiraal, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schalekamp, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Admiraal, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schalekamp, M. A.

Hypertension, Vol 16, 555-563, Copyright © 1990 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Intrarenal de novo production of angiotensin I in subjects with renal artery stenosis

PJ Admiraal, FH Derkx, AH Danser, H Pieterman and MA Schalekamp
Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Dijkzigt, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

To estimate the renal extraction and de novo production of angiotensin I and to assess the contribution of blood-borne renin to renal angiotensin I production, the aortic and renal venous plasma levels of renin and intact [125I]angiotensin I and endogenous angiotensin I during continuous systemic intravenous infusion of monoiodinated [125I]angiotensin I were measured in subjects with unilateral renal artery stenosis (n = 8) who were treated with captopril (50 mg b.i.d.). Results demonstrated that 80% of angiotensin I delivered by the renal artery was extracted both by the affected and the unaffected kidney and that on both sides a major part of angiotensin I in the renal vein was derived from intrarenal de novo production. Production of plasma angiotensin I was in excess over extraction (p less than 0.01) on the affected side, whereas extraction was in excess over production (p less than 0.01) on the contralateral side. The plasma level of de novo intrarenally produced angiotensin I in the renal vein was seven times higher on the affected side than the contralateral side. This difference was by far too big to be explained by a difference in the transit time of blood between the two kidneys, by an augmented production of angiotensin I in the circulating blood passing through the affected kidney due to the higher level of venous plasma renin activity in that kidney, or by the combination of both.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
H. Kobori, M. Nangaku, L. G. Navar, and A. Nishiyama
The Intrarenal Renin-Angiotensin System: From Physiology to the Pathobiology of Hypertension and Kidney Disease
Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2007; 59(3): 251 - 287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
R. K. Handa
Angiotensin-(1-7) can interact with the rat proximal tubule AT4 receptor system
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, July 1, 1999; 277(1): F75 - F83.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M.-L. Lachurie, M. Azizi, T.-T. Guyene, F. Alhenc-Gelas, and J. Menard
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Gene Polymorphism Has No Influence on the Circulating Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System or Blood Pressure in Normotensive Subjects
Circulation, June 15, 1995; 91(12): 2933 - 2942.
[Abstract] [Full Text]