Hypertension, Vol 18, 289-298, Copyright © 1991 by American Heart Association
JF Setaro, MC Saddler, CC Chen, PB Hoffer, DA Roer, DM Markowitz, GH Meier, RJ Gusberg and HR Black
To improve the diagnosis and forecast the response to surgery or renal
angioplasty in patients with hypertension and renal artery stenosis, we
employed a simplified captopril renography protocol in conjunction with
renal arteriography in 94 clinically selected patients. Fifty hypertensive
patients (group 1) with a high clinical likelihood of renovascular
hypertension were evaluated using a simplified captopril renography
protocol and renal angiography on the arterial side. Criteria for normal
captopril renal scintigrams were established based on this original cohort
and validated in an additional 44 clinically comparable patients (group 2).
Renal revascularization or nephrectomy was performed in 39 patients, and
success of the procedure was determined in the 34 patients for whom 3-month
follow-up was available. In the 94 patients, 44 (47%) had renal artery
stenosis. Simplified captopril renography was 91% sensitive and 94%
specific in identifying or excluding renal artery stenosis in the combined
group, with no difference in the diagnostic utility between groups 1 and 2,
or in those with renal insufficiency (n = 38) or those with bilateral
disease (n = 17). Scintigraphic abnormalities induced by captopril were
strongly associated with cure or improvement in blood pressure control
following revascularization or nephrectomy (15 of 18), while the lack of
captopril-induced changes was associated with failure of such intervention
(13 of 16) (p = 0.0004). We conclude that simplified captopril renography
is highly sensitive and specific in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis
in a clinically selected high-risk population and that the test accurately
predicts the success or failure of therapeutic intervention.
ARTICLES
Simplified captopril renography in diagnosis and treatment of renal artery stenosis
Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. A. Creager, D. W. Jones, J. D. Easton, J. L. Halperin, A. T. Hirsch, A. H. Matsumoto, P. T. O'Gara, R. D. Safian, G. L. Schwartz, and J. A. Spittell Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease Conference: Writing Group V: Medical Decision Making and Therapy Circulation, June 1, 2004; 109(21): 2634 - 2642. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Huot and J. Concato Captopril Renal Scans for Detecting Renal Artery Stenosis--Reply Arch Intern Med, March 10, 2003; 163(5): 630 - 631. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Huot, J. H. Hansson, H. Dey, and J. Concato Utility of Captopril Renal Scans for Detecting Renal Artery Stenosis Arch Intern Med, September 23, 2002; 162(17): 1981 - 1984. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Sarkar, D. N. Siegel, G. Soulez, and V. L. Oliva Invited Commentary Authors' Response RadioGraphics, September 1, 2000; 20(5): 1368 - 1372. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. S. Lee, N. M. Rofsky, A. T. Ton, G. Johnson, G. A. Krinsky, and J. C. Weinreb Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor-Enhanced Phase-Contrast MR Imaging to Measure Renal Artery Velocity Waveforms in Patients with Suspected Renovascular Hypertension Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2000; 174(2): 499 - 508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Collins and R. J. Gusberg Current Perspectives on the Role of Captopril Imaging in the Diagnosis of Renovascular Disease Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, January 1, 2000; 13(1): 43 - 69. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. C. van Jaarsveld, P. Krijnen, F. H. M. Derkx, H. Y. Oei, C. T. Postma, and M. A. D. H. Schalekamp The Place of Renal Scintigraphy in the Diagnosis of Renal Artery Stenosis: Fifteen Years of Clinical Experience Arch Intern Med, June 9, 1997; 157(11): 1226 - 1234. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. R. Black and J.-Y. Yi A New Classification Scheme for Hypertension Based on Relative and Absolute Risk With Implications for Treatment and Reimbursement Hypertension, November 1, 1996; 28(5): 719 - 724. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
W. J. Elliott, W. B. Martin, and M. B. Murphy Comparison of Two Noninvasive Screening Tests for Renovascular Hypertension Arch Intern Med, March 22, 1993; 153(6): 755 - 764. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Davidson and C. S. Wilcox Newer Tests for the Diagnosis of Renovascular Disease JAMA, December 16, 1992; 268(23): 3353 - 3358. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Mann and T. G. Pickering Detection of Renovascular Hypertension: State of the Art: 1992 Ann Intern Med, November 15, 1992; 117(10): 845 - 853. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1991 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |