Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1991;18:593-597

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by West, J. N.
Right arrow Articles by Littler, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by West, J. N.
Right arrow Articles by Littler, W. A.

Hypertension, Vol 18, 593-597, Copyright © 1991 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Effect of unrestricted activity on accuracy of ambulatory blood pressure measurement

JN West, JN Townend, P Davies, JJ Sheridan, TJ Stallard, MK Davies and WA Littler
University of Birmingham, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, UK.

A validation study of the Takeda TM-2420 ambulatory blood pressure recorder was performed on 10 subjects using the Oxford ambulatory intra- arterial recording apparatus during unrestricted activity. Electronic linkage of the two recorders ensured simultaneous blood pressure readings, taken from opposite arms. Although there was close approximation of intra-arterial and automated sphygmomanometric recordings over the range of blood pressure encountered in this study, there was a wide scatter of points and a tendency for the machine to underestimate systolic pressure by more than 15 mm Hg in the hypertensive range (systolic blood pressure more than 160 mm Hg) was detected. These findings suggest that automated recording of blood pressure during unrestricted activity may have a proportion of artifactual readings. Although simultaneous intra-arterial blood pressure recording may not be appropriate for widespread use in device validation, this study illustrated some potential disadvantages of the current validation recommendations, namely, the absence of assessment of device accuracy during unrestricted and ambulatory activity.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
E. O’Brien, N. Atkins, and J. Staessen
State of the Market : A Review of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Devices
Hypertension, November 1, 1995; 26(5): 835 - 842.
[Abstract] [Full Text]