Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1992;19:595-605

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Idema, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Man in 't Veld, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Idema, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Man in 't Veld, A. J.

Hypertension, Vol 19, 595-605, Copyright © 1992 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

A new model for diurnal blood pressure profiling. Square wave fit compared with conventional methods

RN Idema, ES Gelsema, GJ Wenting, JL Grashuis, AH van den Meiracker, RM Brouwer and AJ Man in 't Veld
Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

For the characterization of diurnal blood pressure variation, we developed a simple mathematical model that nevertheless does justice to the specific form characteristics of individual blood pressure registrations. Analysis was based on 24-hour continuous intra-arterial measurement of blood pressure obtained in 23 hospitalized patients with mild-to-moderate untreated essential hypertension (mean +/- SD, 112 +/- 13 mm Hg). The day-night difference for mean arterial pressure varied markedly (mean, 18.6 mm Hg; range, 6.8-36.0). Inspection of profiles suggested a model of blood pressure as two contiguous, complementary periods of constant pressure, a so-called square wave. Determination of the times of transience between both periods (segmentation) was performed individually using a least-square error criterion. Results were compared with those obtained by conventional methods, including analysis by Fourier modeling. The square wave fit accounted for a larger fraction (66%) of circadian variance of mean arterial pressure than modeling based on segmentation by visual inspection (59%, considerable observer bias) or by clock time (50%). Application of the Minnesota Cosinor Method resulted in the poorest description (47%). Segmentation based on harmonic modeling (61%) appeared to be cumbersome (10 harmonics needed), and the significance of additional information offered over the square wave fit is dubious. Observer bias makes segmentation by visual inspection unsuitable for assessment of the circadian variance of blood pressure. Even when daily activities are strictly regulated (hospital environment), circadian variance is not well modeled by clock time. As compared with harmonic analysis, square wave fitting is simple, and it appears to best model the circadian variance. The method can also be applied to data obtained from noninvasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
G. A. Head, C. M. Reid, and E. V. Lukoshkova
Nonsymmetrical double logistic analysis of ambulatory blood pressure recordings
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2005; 98(4): 1511 - 1518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
R. H. Fagard, J. A. Staessen, and L. Thijs
Prediction of Cardiac Structure and Function by Repeated Clinic and Ambulatory Blood Pressure
Hypertension, January 1, 1997; 29(1): 22 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text]