Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1994;23:1006-1011

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jamerson, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Julius, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jamerson, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Julius, S.

Hypertension, Vol 23, 1006-1011, Copyright © 1994 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Vasoconstriction with norepinephrine causes less forearm insulin resistance than a reflex sympathetic vasoconstriction

KA Jamerson, SD Smith, JV Amerena, E Grant and S Julius
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor 48109-0356.

We used the insulin-perfused human forearm model to assess the effects of vasoconstriction induced with norepinephrine on the extraction of glucose in the forearm in two groups of healthy young volunteers. The norepinephrine findings were compared with a previously studied group in which vasoconstriction has been caused by reflex activation of the sympathetic nervous system. The aim of the study was to determine the relative importance of hemodynamic and receptor-mediated mechanisms of insulin resistance. Plasma insulin, arterial and venous glucose samples, and forearm blood flow were measured at 10-minute intervals during a 30-minute baseline, a 60-minute intra-arterial insulin infusion, and during 30 minutes of insulin infusion plus vasoconstriction. Group 1 (n = 14) had physiological vasoconstriction induced by inflation of bilateral thigh cuffs to 40 mm Hg to cause pooling of blood in the lower extremities and reflex vasoconstriction in the forearm; group 2 (n = 8) had intra-arterial infusion of norepinephrine to achieve the same degree of vasoconstriction as seen with inflation of thigh cuffs in group 1. Subjects in group 3 (n = 7) had infusion of intra-arterial norepinephrine to achieve a twofold increase in physiological vasoconstriction. With a physiological decrease in forearm blood flow (group 1), there was a 19% decrease in forearm blood flow resulting in a 23% reduction in glucose uptake in the forearm (P < .03). The same degree of reduction in forearm blood flow with a predominantly alpha-adrenergic agonist, norepinephrine (group 2), causes much less insulin resistance (a decrease in utilization of 13%) (P < .04).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular DiseaseHome page
M. Saha and A. D Timmis
Review: Diabetic autonomic dysfunction: adverse effects on presentation, management and outcomes of acute coronary syndromes
The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease, September 1, 2005; 5(5): 260 - 264.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C.-C. Juan, Y. Chien, L.-Y. Wu, W.-M. Yang, C.-L. Chang, Y.-H. Lai, P.-H. Ho, C. F. Kwok, and L.-T. Ho
Angiotensin II Enhances Insulin Sensitivity in Vitro and in Vivo
Endocrinology, May 1, 2005; 146(5): 2246 - 2254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
K. Mather, M. Laakso, S. Edelman, G. Hook, and A. Baron
Evidence for physiological coupling of insulin-mediated glucose metabolism and limb blood flow
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, December 1, 2000; 279(6): E1264 - E1270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
K. A. Jamerson, S. D. Nesbitt, J. V. Amerena, E. Grant, and S. Julius
Angiotensin Mediates Forearm Glucose Uptake by Hemodynamic Rather Than Direct Effects
Hypertension, April 1, 1996; 27(4): 854 - 858.
[Abstract] [Full Text]