Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1994;24:271-279

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Semigran, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Fifer, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Semigran, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Fifer, M. A.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*High Blood Pressure

Hypertension, Vol 24, 271-279, Copyright © 1994 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Effects of atrial natriuretic peptide on left ventricular function in hypertension

MJ Semigran, CN Aroney, HC Herrmann, GW Dec, CA Boucher and MA Fifer
Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114.

Atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) has natriuretic and vasodilator actions that lower arterial pressure and may be beneficial to hypertensive patients. To assess the effects of ANP on left ventricular function in patients with hypertension, we compared it with the pure vasodilator nitroprusside. Simultaneous left ventricular micromanometer pressure and radionuclide volume were obtained at baseline, during nitroprusside infusion, during a second baseline period, and during ANP infusion in 10 patients with hypertension. Mean arterial pressure fell during ANP and nitroprusside. Heart rate and plasma norepinephrine levels increased by similar amounts during the two agents, whereas cardiac index and stroke volume index were unchanged during both. Peak positive left ventricular dP/dt fell similarly during ANP and nitroprusside, but left ventricular dP/dt at a developed pressure of 40 mm Hg, a less load-dependent index of contractility, was unchanged during both. The relation between end-systolic pressure and volume during ANP infusion was not shifted leftward or rightward from that during nitroprusside infusion, indicating no inotropic effect. Both ANP and nitroprusside shortened at time constant of isovolumic relaxation calculated by the logarithmic method but did not change the time constant calculated by the derivative method. Peak filling rate was unchanged from baseline during both agents. ANP did not shift the end- diastolic pressure-volume point away from the relation constructed from baseline and nitroprusside points. We conclude that ANP has no direct effect on myocardial contractile or diastolic function in patients with hypertension.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
T. Nishikimi, N. Maeda, and H. Matsuoka
The role of natriuretic peptides in cardioprotection
Cardiovasc Res, February 1, 2006; 69(2): 318 - 328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
G. La Villa, G. Bisi, C. Lazzeri, C. Fronzaroli, L. Stefani, G. Barletta, R. Del Bene, G. Messeri, G. Strazzulla, and F. Franchi
Cardiovascular Effects of Brain Natriuretic Peptide in Essential Hypertension
Hypertension, May 1, 1995; 25(5): 1053 - 1057.
[Abstract] [Full Text]