Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1994;24:786-792

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bovet, P.
Right arrow Articles by Burnand, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bovet, P.
Right arrow Articles by Burnand, B.

Hypertension, Vol 24, 786-792, Copyright © 1994 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Systematic difference between blood pressure readings caused by cuff type [published erratum appears in Hypertension 1995 Apr;25(4 Pt 1):660]

P Bovet, P Hungerbuhler, J Quilindo, ML Grettve, B Waeber and B Burnand
Clinical Epidemiology Unit, University of Lausanne, Switzerland.

In this study we determine whether blood pressure readings using a cuff of fixed size systematically differed from readings made with a triple- bladder cuff (Tricuff) that automatically adjusts bladder width to arm circumference and assessed subsequent clinical and epidemiological effects. Blood pressure was measured with a standard cuff or a Tricuff in 454 patients visiting an outpatient clinic in the Seychelles (Indian Ocean). Overall means of within-individual standard cuff-Tricuff differences in systolic and diastolic blood pressures were examined in relation to arm circumference and sex. The standard cuff-Tricuff difference in systolic and diastolic blood pressures increased monotonically with circumference (from 4.7 +/- 0.8/3.2 +/- 0.7 mm Hg for arm circumference of 30 to 31 cm to 10.0 +/- 1.1/8.0 +/- 0.9 mm Hg for arm circumference > or = 36 cm) and was larger in women than men. Multivariate linear regression indicated independent effects of arm circumference and sex. Forty percent of subjects with a diastolic blood pressure of > or = 95 mm Hg measured with a standard cuff had values less than 95 mm Hg measured with a Tricuff. Extrapolation to the entire population of the Seychelles decreased the prevalence of blood pressure greater than or equal to 160/95 mm Hg by 11.5% and 24.0% in men and women, respectively, aged 35 to 64 years. The age-adjusted effect of body mass index on systolic and diastolic blood pressures decreased twofold using blood pressure readings made with a Tricuff instead of a standard cuff.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M. Bochud, P. Bovet, R. C. Elston, F. Paccaud, C. Falconnet, M. Maillard, C. Shamlaye, and M. Burnier
High Heritability of Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Families of East African Descent
Hypertension, March 1, 2005; 45(3): 445 - 450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. G. Pickering, J. E. Hall, L. J. Appel, B. E. Falkner, J. Graves, M. N. Hill, D. W. Jones, T. Kurtz, S. G. Sheps, and E. J. Roccella
Recommendations for Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans and Experimental Animals: Part 1: Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans: A Statement for Professionals From the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research
Circulation, February 8, 2005; 111(5): 697 - 716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
T. G. Pickering, J. E. Hall, L. J. Appel, B. E. Falkner, J. Graves, M. N. Hill, D. W. Jones, T. Kurtz, S. G. Sheps, and E. J. Roccella
Recommendations for Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans and Experimental Animals: Part 1: Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans: A Statement for Professionals From the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research
Hypertension, January 1, 2005; 45(1): 142 - 161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]