Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1995;26:835-842

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O’Brien, E.
Right arrow Articles by Staessen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O’Brien, E.
Right arrow Articles by Staessen, J.

(Hypertension. 1995;26:835.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

State of the Market

A Review of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Devices

Eoin O’Brien; Neil Atkins; Jan Staessen

From The Blood Pressure Unit, Beaumont Hospital (E.O’B., N.A.), Dublin, Ireland, and Klinisch Laboratorium Hypertensie, Inwendige Geneeskunde-Cardiologie (J.S.), UZ Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.

Abstract The introduction of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement into clinical practice created a large market for ambulatory blood pressure measurement devices. Forty-three such devices from 31 manufacturers or suppliers are now available to satisfy a market demand that is likely to increase. The aim of this article is to identify the devices available and then to examine critically any validation studies assessing accuracy and performance. Of the 43 devices available 18 have been validated according to the protocols of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) or the British Hypertension Society (BHS) in 25 reported studies. In 9 of these studies the protocol was not adhered to, and the results, which are therefore questionable, are noted but not considered further. Fourteen devices were evaluated according to the accuracy criteria of both protocols, and of these 9 fulfilled the requirements. From this review of 43 devices on the market it may be concluded that, at the time of writing, there is published evidence for only 9 devices meeting the generally accepted AAMI and BHS criteria for accuracy and performance; these are the A&D TM-2420 models 6 and 7 and TM-2421, CH-Druck, Nissei ABPM DS-240, Profilomat, QuietTrak, and SpaceLabs SL-90202 and SL-90207.


Key Words: blood pressure monitoring, ambulatory • equipment design • evaluation studies • durable medical equipment




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
T. B. Torbjornsdotter, G. A. Jaremko, and U. B. Berg
Nondipping and Its Relation to Glomerulopathy and Hyperfiltration in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes
Diabetes Care, February 1, 2004; 27(2): 510 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
F.M. McKevitt, A. Sivaguru, G.S. Venables, T.J. Cleveland, P.A. Gaines, J.D. Beard, and K.S. Channer
Effect of Treatment of Carotid Artery Stenosis on Blood Pressure: A Comparison of Hemodynamic Disturbances After Carotid Endarterectomy and Endovascular Treatment
Stroke, November 1, 2003; 34(11): 2576 - 2581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
A. M. Simckes, T. Srivastava, and U. S. Alon
Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Children and Adolescents
Clinical Pediatrics, October 1, 2002; 41(8): 549 - 564.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
J. E. Lewis, E. Boyle, L. Magharious, and M. G. Myers
Evaluation of a community-based automated blood pressure measuring device
Can. Med. Assoc. J., April 1, 2002; 166(9): 1145 - 1148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
B. Frauchiger, H. P. Schmid, C. Roedel, P. Moosmann, and D. Staub
Comparison of Carotid Arterial Resistive Indices With Intima-Media Thickness as Sonographic Markers of Atherosclerosis
Stroke, April 1, 2001; 32(4): 836 - 841.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
E. O'Brien, B. Waeber, G. Parati, J. Staessen, and M. G Myers
Blood pressure measuring devices: recommendations of the European Society of Hypertension
BMJ, March 3, 2001; 322(7285): 531 - 536.
[Full Text]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
J. A Staessen, E. T O'Brien, L. Thijs, and R. H Fagard
Modern approaches to blood pressure measurement
Occup. Environ. Med., August 1, 2000; 57(8): 510 - 520.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
E. Lurbe and J. Redon
Assessing ambulatory blood pressure in renal diseases: facts and concerns
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 1999; 14(11): 2564 - 2568.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
J. E. Naschitz, L. Loewenstein, E. Zuckerman, D. Yeshurun, J. A. Staessen, and E. O'Brien
Reliability of Self-Measured Blood Pressure for Research Purposes
Arch Intern Med, October 25, 1999; 159(19): 2365 - 2366.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
K. Seppa and P. Sillanaukee
Binge Drinking and Ambulatory Blood Pressure
Hypertension, January 1, 1999; 33(1): 79 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
L. Thijs, J. A. Staessen, H. Celis, R. de Gaudemaris, Y. Imai, S. Julius, and R. Fagard
Reference Values for Self-recorded Blood Pressure: A Meta-analysis of Summary Data
Arch Intern Med, March 9, 1998; 158(5): 481 - 488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
J. A. Staessen, L. Bieniaszewski, E. O'Brien, P. Gosse, H. Hayashi, Y. Imai, T. Kawasaki, K. Otsuka, P. Palatini, L. Thijs, et al.
Nocturnal Blood Pressure Fall on Ambulatory Monitoring in a Large International Database
Hypertension, January 1, 1997; 29(1): 30 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
BMJHome page
N. Prasad and C. Isles
Fortnightly Review: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a guide for general practitioners
BMJ, December 14, 1996; 313(7071): 1535 - 1541.
[Abstract] [Full Text]