This Article Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Staessen, J. A. Articles by Fagard, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Staessen, J. A. Articles by Fagard, R.

(Hypertension. 1995;26:942-949.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.

Articles

The Trough-to-Peak Ratio as an Instrument to Evaluate Antihypertensive Drugs

Jan A. Staessen; Leszek Bieniaszewski; Frank Buntinx; Hilde Celis; Eoin T. O'Brien; Roger Van Hoof; Robert Fagard; on Behalf of the APTH Investigators

Correspondence to Jan A. Staessen, MD, PhD, Klinisch Laboratorium Hypertensie, Inwendige Geneeskunde-Cardiologie, UZ Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.

Abstract The U.S. Food and Drug Administration designed the trough-to-peak ratio as an instrument for the evaluation of long-acting antihypertensive drugs, but the ratios are usually reported without accounting for interindividual variability. This study investigated how the trough-to-peak ratio would be affected by interindividual and intraindividual variability and by smoothing of the diurnal blood pressure profiles. The ambulatory blood pressure was recorded on placebo in 143 hypertensive patients (diastolic pressure on conventional measurement >95 mm Hg). After 2 months, the recordings were repeated on 10 mg (n=66) or 20 mg (n=77) lisinopril given once daily between 7 and 11 PM. The baseline-adjusted trough-to-peak ratios were determined from diurnal blood pressure profiles with 1-hour precision. Lisinopril reduced (±SD) the 24-hour pressure by 16±17 mm Hg for systolic and 10±10 mm Hg for diastolic (P<.001). According to the usual approach, disregarding interindividual variability, the trough-to-peak ratio was 0.72 for systolic pressure and 0.67 for diastolic pressure. In the 143 patients the ratios were not normally distributed. They were the same on both lisinopril doses. When interindividual variability was accounted for, the median trough-to-peak ratio was 0.34 (P₅ to P₉₅ interval, -0.46 to 0.87) for systolic pressure and 0.26 (-0.44 to 0.84) for diastolic pressure. In 66 patients examined twice on 10 mg lisinopril at a median interval of 32 days, the trough-to-peak ratios were characterized by large intraindividual variability. The median trough-to-peak ratios increased (P<.001) when the individual blood pressure profiles were progressively smoothed by substituting 1-hour averages by 2-hour moving averages (systolic/diastolic pressure, 0.41/0.27), 2-hour averages (0.43/0.29), 3-hour moving averages (0.42/0.34), or 3-hour averages (0.47/0.36). In conclusion, the trough-to-peak ratio is idealized by not accounting for interindividual and intraindividual variabilities and by smoothing of the diurnal blood pressure profiles. If after review of its usefulness the trough-to-peak ratio is further instituted as an instrument in the evaluation of long-acting antihypertensive drugs, its determination and presentation must be regulated beyond the presently available recommendations.

Key Words: antihypertensive therapy • blood pressure monitoring, ambulatory • lisinopril

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. A. Staessen, L. Thijs, G. Bijttebier, D. Clement, E. T. O'Brien, P. Palatini, J. L. Rodicio, J. Rosenfeld, and R. Fagard Determining the Trough-to-Peak Ratio in Parallel-Group Trials Hypertension, February 1, 1997; 29(2): 659 - 667. [Abstract] [Full Text]