Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1997;30:240-246

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Price, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hollenberg, N. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Price, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hollenberg, N. K.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Blood Pressure Medicines
Hazardous Substances DB
*THIOPHENE

(Hypertension. 1997;30:240-246.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Renal Hemodynamic Response to an Angiotensin II Antagonist, Eprosartan, in Healthy Men

Deborah A. Price; Jose Mario De'Oliveira; Naomi D. L. Fisher; ; Norman K. Hollenberg

From the Departments of Medicine and Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

Abstract In view of the vasodilator potential of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition via prostaglandins and kinins, we asked why renin inhibition induces a larger renal vasodilator response than ACE inhibitors in healthy humans in earlier studies. One possibility was that there was a more complete blockade of the renin system, which could also be achieved by an angiotensin II antagonist, eprosartan. We measured the hormonal and renal hemodynamic responses to eprosartan doses, from 10 to 400 mg in 9 healthy young men in balance on a 10-mmol/d sodium intake. The threshold eprosartan dose to influence renal perfusion was <10 mg, and the 100-mg dose induced a near-maximal vasodilator response of 135±19.7 mL · min-1 · 1.73 m2. When the dose was increased to 400 mg, there was a modest additional increase of 147±57 mL · min-1 · 1.73 m–2. A highly significant dose-related fall in arterial blood pressure occurred (r=-.97; P<.001), with no indication of a maximal response at 400 mg. In 6 additional subjects, we compared responses to eprosartan on a high salt and a low salt diet. The renal response to 200 mg eprosartan on a high salt diet, 26.0±6.6 mL · min-1 · 1.73 m–2, was significantly less than that seen with the low salt diet (P<.001). There was no renal partial agonist angiotensin-like effect of eprosartan. Eprosartan reduced sharply the pressor, renal vascular, and hormonal responses to exogenous angiotensin II. The renal vasodilator response to the angiotensin II antagonist eprosartan closely resembles responses to renin inhibition and exceeds previously reported responses to ACE inhibitors. Thus, eprosartan probably exerted its effect via the angiotensin receptor. More complete blockade of the renin system can be achieved by pharmacological interruption at this level, a finding that could have therapeutic implications.


Key Words: angiotensin II • aldosterone • renin • antihypertensive agents • renal circulation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
N. D.L. Fisher, A.H. Jan Danser, J. Nussberger, W. P. Dole, and N. K. Hollenberg
Renal and Hormonal Responses to Direct Renin Inhibition With Aliskiren in Healthy Humans
Circulation, June 24, 2008; 117(25): 3199 - 3205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
T. Juhlin, L. R. Erhardt, H. Ottosson, B. A.G. Jonsson, and P. Hoglund
Treatments with losartan or enalapril are equally sensitive to deterioration in renal function from cyclooxygenase inhibition
Eur J Heart Fail, February 1, 2007; 9(2): 191 - 196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
E. J. Lewis, L. G. Hunsicker, W. R. Clarke, T. Berl, M. A. Pohl, J. B. Lewis, E. Ritz, R. C. Atkins, R. Rohde, I. Raz, et al.
Renoprotective Effect of the Angiotensin-Receptor Antagonist Irbesartan in Patients with Nephropathy Due to Type 2 Diabetes
N. Engl. J. Med., September 20, 2001; 345(12): 851 - 860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M. C. Lansang, S. Y. Osei, D. A. Price, N. D. L. Fisher, and N. K. Hollenberg
Renal Hemodynamic and Hormonal Responses to the Angiotensin II Antagonist Candesartan
Hypertension, November 1, 2000; 36(5): 834 - 838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
S. Y. Osei, D. A. Price, L. M. B. Laffel, M. C. Lansang, and N. K. Hollenberg
Effect of Angiotensin II Antagonist Eprosartan on Hyperglycemia-Induced Activation of Intrarenal Renin-Angiotensin System in Healthy Humans
Hypertension, July 1, 2000; 36(1): 122 - 126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
N. K. Hollenberg
Implications of Species Difference for Clinical Investigation : Studies on the Renin-Angiotensin System
Hypertension, January 1, 2000; 35(1): 150 - 154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
D. A. PRICE, L. E. PORTER, M. GORDON, N. D. L. FISHER, J. M. F. DE'OLIVEIRA, L. M. B. LAFFEL, D. R. PASSAN, G. H. WILLIAMS, and N. K. HOLLENBERG
The Paradox of the Low-Renin State in Diabetic Nephropathy
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 1999; 10(11): 2382 - 2391.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
S. Brodsky, K. Gurbanov, Z. Abassi, A. Hoffman, R. R. Ruffolo Jr, G. Z. Feuerstein, and J. Winaver
Effects of Eprosartan on Renal Function and Cardiac Hypertrophy in Rats With Experimental Heart Failure
Hypertension, October 1, 1998; 32(4): 746 - 752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
N. K. Hollenberg, N. D. L. Fisher, and D. A. Price
Pathways for Angiotensin II Generation in Intact Human Tissue : Evidence From Comparative Pharmacological Interruption of the Renin System
Hypertension, September 1, 1998; 32(3): 387 - 392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]