This Article Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hermida, R. C. Articles by Ayala, D. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hermida, R. C. Articles by Ayala, D. E.

(Hypertension. 1997;30:1531-1537.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.

Articles

Diagnosing Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia With the 24-Hour Mean of Blood Pressure

Ramón C. Hermida; ; Diana E. Ayala

From the Bioengineering & Chronobiology Laboratories, ETSI Telecomunicación, University of Vigo, Campus Universitario, Vigo, 36200 Spain.

Correspondence and reprint requests to Prof Ramón C. Hermida, PhD, Bioengineering and Chronobiology Labs, ETSI Telecomunicación, Campus Universitario, VIGO (Pontevedra) 36200, SPAIN. E-mail rhermida{at}tsc.uvigo.es

Abstract The use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring has provided a method of blood pressure assessment that may compensate for some of the limitations of isolated measurements. Here we aim to examine prospectively the effectiveness of the commonly used 24-hour mean as a potential screening test for the identification of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. We analyzed 503 blood pressure series from 71 healthy pregnant women and 256 series from 42 women who developed gestational hypertension or preeclampsia. Forty-eight-hour blood pressure monitoring was done once every 4 weeks after the first obstetric consultation. Sensitivity and specificity of the 24-hour mean of blood pressure were computed for each trimester of pregnancy by comparing distributions of values obtained for healthy and complicated pregnancies, without assuming an a priori threshold for diagnosing gestational hypertension on the basis of mean blood pressure. Sensitivity ranges from 31.8% for diastolic blood pressure in the second trimester to 84.1% for systolic blood pressure in the third trimester. However, specificity is as low as 6.9% for diastolic blood pressure in the first trimester. The positive predictive value does not reach 55% for any variable in any trimester. The higher relative risk was consistently obtained for systolic blood pressure (4.9 in the third trimester). Despite the highly statistically significant differences in blood pressure found between healthy and complicated pregnancies in all trimesters, the daily mean of blood pressure does not provide a proper and stable individualized test for diagnosing hypertensive complications in pregnancy. Other indexes obtained from the blood pressure series have been shown, however, to identify early in pregnancy those women who subsequently will develop gestational hypertension or preeclampsia, rendering ambulatory blood pressure monitoring a useful, but still costly, technique in pregnancy.

Key Words: blood pressure • hypertension, gestational • pregnancy • normotension • preeclampsia • blood pressure monitoring, ambulatory

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. C. Hermida, D. E. Ayala, and M. Iglesias Differences in Circadian Pattern of Ambulatory Pulse Pressure Between Healthy and Complicated Pregnancies Hypertension, September 1, 2004; 44(3): 316 - 321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. C. Hermida and D. E. Ayala Sampling Requirements for Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in the Diagnosis of Hypertension in Pregnancy Hypertension, October 1, 2003; 42(4): 619 - 624. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. C. Hermida and D. E. Ayala Prognostic Value of Office and Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurements in Pregnancy Hypertension, September 1, 2002; 40(3): 298 - 303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. C. Hermida and D. E. Ayala Evaluation of the Blood Pressure Load in the Diagnosis of Hypertension in Pregnancy Hypertension, September 1, 2001; 38(3): 723 - 729. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. C. Hermida, D. E. Ayala, and M. Iglesias Predictable Blood Pressure Variability in Healthy and Complicated Pregnancies Hypertension, September 1, 2001; 38(3): 736 - 741. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. C. Hermida, D. E. Ayala, A. Mojon, and J. R. Fernandez Time-Qualified Reference Values for Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Pregnancy Hypertension, September 1, 2001; 38(3): 746 - 752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A Staessen, E. T O'Brien, L. Thijs, and R. H Fagard Modern approaches to blood pressure measurement Occup. Environ. Med., August 1, 2000; 57(8): 510 - 520. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				R. C. Hermida, D. E. Ayala, A. Mojon, J. R. Fernandez, I. Alonso, I. Silva, R. Ucieda, and M. Iglesias Blood Pressure Patterns in Normal Pregnancy, Gestational Hypertension, and Preeclampsia Hypertension, August 1, 2000; 36(2): 149 - 158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. C. Hermida, J. R. Fernandez, A. Mojon, and D. E. Ayala Reproducibility of the Hyperbaric Index as a Measure of Blood Pressure Excess Hypertension, January 1, 2000; 35(1): 118 - 125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Bellomo, P. L. Narducci, F. Rondoni, G. Pastorelli, G. Stangoni, G. Angeli, and P. Verdecchia Prognostic Value of 24-Hour Blood Pressure in Pregnancy JAMA, October 20, 1999; 282(15): 1447 - 1452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]