From the Cattedra di Medicina Interna, Ospedale San Gerardo, Monza,
Università di Milano, Centro di Fisiologia Clinica e Ipertensione,
Ospedale Maggiore, and Istituto Scientifico Ospedale San Luca, Istituto
Auxologico Italiano, Milano (S.O., G.M.); Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e
Terapia Medica, Università di Pavia, Pavia (R.F.); Clinica Medica I,
Università di Padova, Padova (P.P.); and Istituto di Patologia Medica,
Ospedale Umberto I, Università di Ancona, Ancona (A.R.), Italy.
Correspondence to Giuseppe Mancia, MD, Cattedra di Medicina Interna, Ospedale San Gerardo dei Tintori, Università di Milano, Via Donizetti 106, 20052 Monza (Milano), Italy. E-mail mancia.g{at}imiucca.csi.unimi.it
AbstractThe objectives of our study
were to assess the reproducibility of the trough-to-peak ratio (T/P)
and to see whether a high T/P is accompanied by more organ protection
or vice versa. The study included 175 (mean±SD age, 51±9 years)
subjects with mild-moderate essential hypertension who had
echocardiographic evidence of left
ventricular (LV) hypertrophy taken from the
SAMPLE study (Study on Ambulatory Monitoring of Blood Pressure and
Lisinopril Evaluation), an open-label multicenter study.
The study included a 3-week washout pretreatment period, a 12-month
treatment period with lisinopril (n=84) or
lisinopril plus hydrochlorothiazide (n=91)
once daily, and a 4-week placebo follow-up period. Results of 24-hour
ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and
echocardiographic determination of left
ventricular mass index (LVMI) were obtained before and
after 3 and 12 months of treatment. T/Ps were computed in each patient
by dividing the systolic and diastolic blood
pressure changes at trough (changes in the last 2 hours of the
monitoring period) by those at peak (average of the 2 adjacent hours
with the maximal blood pressure reduction between the 2nd and 8th hour
from drug intake) after 3 and 12 months of treatment. Average 24-hour
blood pressure was similarly reduced at 3 and 12 months. Trough blood
pressure changes at 3 and 12 months were closely correlated, as were
the corresponding peak blood pressure changes. However, the 3- and
12-month T/Ps correlated to a lesser degree (r<0.42).
Furthermore, the reduction of LVMI induced by treatment was similarly
correlated with the treatment-induced reduction in 24-hour average,
trough, and peak blood pressures but not with the T/Ps. This was also
evident when the contribution to LV hypertrophy regression
by 24-hour blood pressure changes and T/Ps was assessed in a
multivariate regression analysis. In patients
with a T/P
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions
Reproducibility and Clinical Value of the Trough-to-Peak Ratio of the Antihypertensive Effect
Evidence From the Sample Study
0.5 or <0.5, the regression of LVMI was similar. In
conclusion, peak and trough blood pressure changes are reproducible and
predict the regression of LVMI induced by treatment as well as average
24-hour blood pressure. T/Ps are less reproducible, and their value
does not predict regression of organ damage by antihypertensive
treatment.
Key Words: trough-to-peak ratio blood pressure monitoring, ambulatory hypertrophy, left ventricular lisinopril hydrochlorothiazide antihypertensive agents
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1998 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |