Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1999;33:850-855

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mazzolai, L.
Right arrow Articles by Burnier, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mazzolai, L.
Right arrow Articles by Burnier, M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Blood Pressure Medicines
Hazardous Substances DB
*LOSARTAN POTASSIUM
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Right arrow ACE/Angiotension receptors
Right arrow Other hypertension

(Hypertension. 1999;33:850-855.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.


Scientific Contributions

Angiotensin II Receptor Blockade in Normotensive Subjects

A Direct Comparison of Three AT1 Receptor Antagonists

Lucia Mazzolai; Marc Maillard; Julien Rossat; Jürg Nussberger; Hans R. Brunner; Michel Burnier

From the Division of Hypertension and Vascular Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Correspondence to M. Burnier, MD, Division of Hypertension and Vascular Medicine, CHUV, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland. E-mail Michel.Burnier{at}chuv.hospvd.ch

Abstract—Use of angiotensin (Ang) II AT1 receptor antagonists for treatment of hypertension is rapidly increasing, yet direct comparisons of the relative efficacy of antagonists to block the renin-angiotensin system in humans are lacking. In this study, the Ang II receptor blockade induced by the recommended starting dose of 3 antagonists was evaluated in normotensive subjects in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, 4-way crossover study. At 1-week intervals, 12 subjects received a single dose of losartan (50 mg), valsartan (80 mg), irbesartan (150 mg), or placebo. Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system was assessed before and 4, 24, and 30 hours after drug intake by 3 independent methods: inhibition of the blood pressure response to exogenous Ang II, in vitro Ang II receptor assay, and reactive changes in plasma Ang II levels. At 4 hours, losartan blocked 43% of the Ang II–induced systolic blood pressure increase; valsartan, 51%; and irbesartan, 88% (P<0.01 between drugs). The effect of each drug declined with time. At 24 hours, a residual effect was found with all 3 drugs, but at 30 hours, only irbesartan induced a marked, significant blockade versus placebo. Similar results were obtained when Ang II receptor blockade was assessed with an in vitro receptor assay and by the reactive rise in plasma Ang II levels. This study thus demonstrates that the first administration of the recommended starting dose of irbesartan induces a greater and longer lasting Ang II receptor blockade than that of valsartan and losartan in normotensive subjects.


Key Words: angiotensin II • receptors, angiotensin II • human • irbesartan • losartan • valsartan




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone SystemHome page
M. Burnier
Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system for renal future perspectives protection: from history to future perspective
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, December 1, 2007; 8(4): 208 - 211.
[PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M. Yoneda, H. Sanada, J. Yatabe, S. Midorikawa, S. Hashimoto, M. Sasaki, T. Katoh, T. Watanabe, P. M. Andrews, P. A. Jose, et al.
Differential Effects of Angiotensin II Type-1 Receptor Antisense Oligonucleotides on Renal Function in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats
Hypertension, July 1, 2005; 46(1): 58 - 65.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. J. Campbell, H. Krum, and M. D. Esler
Losartan Increases Bradykinin Levels in Hypertensive Humans
Circulation, January 25, 2005; 111(3): 315 - 320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M. Azizi, A. Bissery, M. Lamarre-Cliche, and J. Menard
Integrating Drug Pharmacokinetics for Phenotyping Individual Renin Response to Angiotensin II Blockade in Humans
Hypertension, April 1, 2004; 43(4): 785 - 790.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
M. J Brown
A RATIONAL BASIS FOR SELECTION AMONG DRUGS OF THE SAME CLASS
Heart, June 1, 2003; 89(6): 687 - 694.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
A. Forclaz, M. Maillard, J. Nussberger, H. R. Brunner, and M. Burnier
Angiotensin II Receptor Blockade: Is There Truly a Benefit of Adding an ACE Inhibitor?
Hypertension, January 1, 2003; 41(1): 31 - 36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
M. P. Maillard, C. Perregaux, C. Centeno, J. Stangier, W. Wienen, H.-R. Brunner, and M. Burnier
In Vitro and in Vivo Characterization of the Activity of Telmisartan: An Insurmountable Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonist
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2002; 302(3): 1089 - 1095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
R. M. Carey, N. L. Howell, X.-H. Jin, and H. M. Siragy
Angiotensin Type 2 Receptor-Mediated Hypotension in Angiotensin Type-1 Receptor-Blocked Rats
Hypertension, December 1, 2001; 38(6): 1272 - 1277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
D. Henrion, N. Kubis, and B. I. Levy
Physiological and Pathophysiological Functions of the AT2 Subtype Receptor of Angiotensin II: From Large Arteries to the Microcirculation
Hypertension, November 1, 2001; 38(5): 1150 - 1157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. W. Auer, R. Berent, B. Eber, and M. Burnier
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers and Congestive Heart Failure Response
Circulation, October 9, 2001; 104 (15): e82 - e82.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone SystemHome page
N. H. Andersen and C. E. Mogensen
Review: Inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system, with particular reference to dual blockade treatment
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, September 1, 2001; 2(3): 146 - 152.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone SystemHome page
M. P Maillard, C. Centeno, A. Frostell-Karlsson, H. R Brunner, and M. Burnier
Does protein binding modulate the effect of angiotensin II receptor antagonists?
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, March 1, 2001; 2(1_suppl): S54 - S58.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
L. Sironi, A. M. Calvio, L. Arnaboldi, A. Corsini, A. Parolari, M. de Gasparo, E. Tremoli, and L. Mussoni
Effect of Valsartan on Angiotensin II-Induced Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 Biosynthesis in Arterial Smooth Muscle Cells
Hypertension, March 1, 2001; 37(3): 961 - 966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Burnier
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers
Circulation, February 13, 2001; 103(6): 904 - 912.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
M. P. Maillard, J. Rossat, H.-R. Brunner, and M. Burnier
Tasosartan, Enoltasosartan, and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockade: The Confounding Role of Protein Binding
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2000; 295(2): 649 - 654.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone SystemHome page
M. S Weinberg, A. J Weinberg, and D. H Zappe
Effectively targetting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in cardiovascular and renal disease: rationale for using angiotensin II receptor blockers in combination with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, September 1, 2000; 1(3): 217 - 233.
[PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
W. Petkun
AT1-receptor blockers
Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2000; 21(4): 335 - 336.
[PDF]