Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1999;34:673-678

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karam, H.
Right arrow Articles by Ménard, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Karam, H.
Right arrow Articles by Ménard, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardio-renal physiology/pathophysiology
Right arrow Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Hypertension - basic studies

(Hypertension. 1999;34:673-678.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.


Scientific Contributions

Contrasting Effects of Selective T- and L-Type Calcium Channel Blockade on Glomerular Damage in DOCA Hypertensive Rats

Habib Karam; Jean-Paul Clozel; Patrick Bruneval; Marie-Françoise Gonzalez; Joël Ménard

From INSERM U367 (H.K., M-F.G., J.M.), Paris, France; ACTELION Ltd (J-P.C.), Allschwil, Switzerland; and INSERM U430, Hôpital Broussais (P.B.), Paris, France

Correspondence to Pr Joël Ménard, INSERM U367, 17, rue du Fer à Moulin, F-75005 Paris, France. E-mail karam{at}ifm.inserm.fr

Abstract—Mibefradil and amlodipine are calcium antagonists with different channel selectivities. Mibefradil blocks both L- and T-type calcium channels; although in the usual pharmacological doses, it predominantly blocks the T-type channels. In contrast, amlodipine selectively blocks L-type channels. The goal of the present study was to assess whether this differential selectivity would result in different effects on end-organ damage in experimental hypertension. For this purpose, deoxycorticosterone acetate (DOCA)–salt hypertensive rats were treated either with equipotent doses of mibefradil or amlodipine (30 mg · kg-1 · d-1 as food admix). Despite the fact that both drugs decreased systolic arterial pressure to the same extent (140±5 mm Hg in the mibefradil group and 144±3 mm Hg in the amlodipine group versus 225±5 mm Hg in the untreated-DOCA group), only mibefradil decreased proteinuria (35.5±6.5 versus 103.3±14.1 mg/24 h in untreated DOCA-salt animals) and prevented glomerular lesions. Both drugs, however, prevented the occurrence of vascular renal lesions. To elucidate the mechanism responsible for this difference, we evaluated in an additional series of experiments the effects of mibefradil and amlodipine on plasma and renal renin concentrations, as well as the effects of the addition of enalapril, an ACE inhibitor, given on top of both drugs on proteinuria. Amlodipine, in contrast to mibefradil, markedly stimulated the plasma (17.8±2.6 ng Ang I · mL-1 · h-1 in the amlodipine group versus 3.9±0.4 ng Ang I · mL-1 · h-1 in the mibefradil group and 3.2±0.3 ng Ang I · mL-1 · h-1 in the untreated-DOCA group) and renal (2.42±0.37 ng Ang I · mL-1 · h-1 in the amlodipine group versus 0.36±0.04 ng Ang I · mL-1 · h-1 in the mibefradil group and 0.26±0.08 ng Ang I · mL-1 · h-1 in the untreated-DOCA group) renin concentrations. Stimulation of the renin-angiotensin system could explain the absence of a renal protective effect of amlodipine. This was also suggested by the fact that enalapril given in addition to amlodipine could decrease proteinuria. In conclusion, T-type channel blockade by mibefradil decreases blood pressure without stimulation of the renin-angiotensin system and therefore prevents most of the glomerular damage in DOCA hypertensive rats.


Key Words: hypertension, experimental • mibefradil • amlodipine • calcium channels • kidney • rats




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
K. Hayashi, S. Wakino, N. Sugano, Y. Ozawa, K. Homma, and T. Saruta
Ca2+ Channel Subtypes and Pharmacology in the Kidney
Circ. Res., February 16, 2007; 100(3): 342 - 353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
E. Perez-Reyes
Molecular Physiology of Low-Voltage-Activated T-type Calcium Channels
Physiol Rev, January 1, 2003; 83(1): 117 - 161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
L. L. Cribbs
Vascular Smooth Muscle Calcium Channels: Could "T" Be a Target?
Circ. Res., September 28, 2001; 89(7): 560 - 562.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
Y. Ozawa, K. Hayashi, T. Nagahama, K. Fujiwara, and T. Saruta
Effect of T-Type Selective Calcium Antagonist on Renal Microcirculation: Studies in the Isolated Perfused Hydronephrotic Kidney
Hypertension, September 1, 2001; 38(3): 343 - 347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
K. A. Griffin, M. Picken, G. L. Bakris, and A. K. Bidani
Comparative Effects of Selective T- and L-Type Calcium Channel Blockers in the Remnant Kidney Model
Hypertension, May 1, 2001; 37(5): 1268 - 1272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]