This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pedrinelli, R. Articles by Mariani, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pedrinelli, R. Articles by Mariani, M. Related Collections Cardiovascular Pharmacology Other hypertension

(Hypertension. 2000;35:621.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.

Scientific Contributions

Amlodipine, Enalapril, and Dependent Leg Edema in Essential Hypertension

Roberto Pedrinelli; Giulia Dell’Omo; Elio Melillo; Mario Mariani

From Dipartimento Cardiotoracico (R.P., G.D., M.M.), Laboratorio Microcircolatorio (E.M.), Medicina Interna, Azienda Ospedaliera, Universita’ di Pisa, Italy.

Correspondence to Dr Roberto Pedrinelli, Dipartimento Cardiotoracico, Università di Pisa, 56100 Pisa, Italy. E-mail r.pedrinelli{at}int.med.unipi.it

Abstract—Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) blunt postural skin vasoconstriction, an autoregulatory mechanism that minimizes gravitational increases in capillary pressure and avoids fluid extravasation when standing. To evaluate the dose-response relation between this pharmacological interference and dependent edema, a frequent side effect of CCBs during antihypertensive treatment, skin blood flow (laser Doppler flowmetry) at the dorsum of the foot, both supine and with the limb passively placed 50 cm below the heart level, and leg weight (Archimedes principle) were measured at baseline, during increasing doses of the dihydropyridine amlodipine (5 and 10 mg UID each for 2 weeks), and after drug withdrawal in 10 hypertensive men. Because angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors may attenuate ankle swelling by CCBs, those parameters were evaluated according to a similar design during amlodipine (10 mg UID) and enalapril (20 mg UID) combined (n=10). As a control, the effect of enalapril monotherapy (10 and 20 mg UID for 2 weeks each) was evaluated in a third series of patients (n=8). Amlodipine (5 mg UID) increased leg weight without modifying postural vasoconstriction (the percent skin blood flow decrease from horizontal to dependent position), which indicates that extravascular fluid shift was independent of postural skin vasoconstriction. At 10 mg UID, however, amlodipine blunted postural vasoconstriction and increased leg weight further, which suggests that skin blood flow autoregulation limited additional fluid transfer. Both parameters normalized after drug withdrawal. Enalapril per se did not affect cutaneous vasomotion or leg weight but reduced the amount of dependent fluid extravasation by the CCB despite a persistent antagonism for postural vasoconstrictor responses.

Key Words: calcium antagonists • angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors • blood flow • vasoconstriction • hypertension, essential

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Jordan, S. Engeli, S. W. Boye, S. Le Breton, and D. L. Keefe Direct Renin Inhibition With Aliskiren in Obese Patients With Arterial Hypertension Hypertension, May 1, 2007; 49(5): 1047 - 1055. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. R. Weir, K. C. Ferdinand, J. M. Flack, K. A. Jamerson, W. Daley, S. Zelenkofske, and for the AADVANCE Investigators A Noninferiority Comparison of Valsartan/Hydrochlorothiazide Combination Versus Amlodipine in Black Hypertensives Hypertension, September 1, 2005; 46(3): 508 - 513. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. P. Blankfield Fluid Matters in Choosing Antihypertensive Therapy: A Hypothesis That the Data Speak Volumes J Am Board Fam Med, March 1, 2005; 18(2): 113 - 124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]