Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2000;36:1045-1052

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rao, F.
Right arrow Articles by O’Connor, D. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rao, F.
Right arrow Articles by O’Connor, D. T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other hypertension
Right arrow Other Treatment
Right arrow Other diagnostic testing

(Hypertension. 2000;36:1045.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


Scientific Contributions

Malignant Pheochromocytoma

Chromaffin Granule Transmitters and Response to Treatment

Fangwen Rao; Harry R. Keiser; Daniel T. O’Connor

From the Department of Medicine and Center for Molecular Genetics (F.R., D.T.O.), University of California, San Diego; the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (H.R.K.), Bethesda, Md; and the VA San Diego Healthcare System (F.R., D.T.O.), San Diego, Calif.

Correspondence to Daniel T. O’Connor, MD, Department of Medicine and Center for Molecular Genetics (9111H), University of California, San Diego, 3350 La Jolla Village Dr, San Diego, CA 92161. E-mail doconnor{at}ucsd.edu

Abstract—Chromaffin granule transmitters such as chromogranin A and catecholamines have been used in the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma, but the diagnostic and prognostic value of chromogranin A have not been explored in malignant pheochromocytoma. We evaluated these transmitters in patients with pheochromocytoma (n=27), both benign (n=13) and malignant (n=14). Patients with benign pheochromocytoma were studied before and after surgical excision (n=6), whereas patients with malignant pheochromocytoma were evaluated before and after combination chemotherapy with regular cycles of cyclophosphamide/dacarbazine/vincristine (nonrandomized trial in n=9). During treatment, patient responses to chemotherapy were divided according to anatomic and clinical criteria: responders (n=5) versus nonresponders (n=4). Plasma chromogranin A rose progressively (P<0.0001) from control subjects (48.0±3.0 ng/mL) to benign pheochromocytoma (188±40.5 ng/mL) to malignant pheochromocytoma (2932±960 ng/mL). Parallel changes were seen for plasma norepinephrine (P<0.0001), though plasma epinephrine was actually lower in malignant than benign pheochromocytoma (P=0.0182). In bivariate analyses, chromogranin A, norepinephrine, and epinephrine discriminated between pheochromocytoma and control subjects (all P<0.0001), whereas in a multivariate analyses, norepinephrine was the best discriminator (P=0.011). Chromogranin A was significantly different in benign versus malignant pheochromocytoma on both bivariate (P=0.0003) and multivariate (P=0.011) analyses. After excision of benign pheochromocytoma, chromogranin A (P=0.028), norepinephrine (P=0.047), and epinephrine (P=0.037) all fell to values near normal. During chemotherapy of malignant pheochromocytoma (n=9), plasma chromogranin A (P=0.047) and norepinephrine (P=0.02) fell but not epinephrine. In 5 responders to chemotherapy, there were significant declines in chromogranin A (P=0.03) and norepinephrine (P=0.03) but not epinephrine; in 4 nonresponders, none of the transmitters changed. Plasma chromogranin A varied longitudinally with tumor response and relapse. We conclude that plasma chromogranin A is an effective tool in the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma, and markedly elevated chromogranin A may point to malignant pheochromocytoma. During chemotherapy of malignant pheochromocytoma, chromogranin A can be used to gauge tumor response and relapse.


Key Words: plasma • chromogranins • norepinephrine • epinephrine




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
A. Chrisoulidou, G. Kaltsas, I. Ilias, and A. B Grossman
The diagnosis and management of malignant phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2007; 14(3): 569 - 585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
G. Eisenhofer, S. R Bornstein, F. M Brouwers, N.-K. V Cheung, P. L Dahia, R. R de Krijger, T. J Giordano, L. A Greene, D. S Goldstein, H. Lehnert, et al.
Malignant pheochromocytoma: current status and initiatives for future progress
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2004; 11(3): 423 - 436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
G. A. Kaltsas, G. M. Besser, and A. B. Grossman
The Diagnosis and Medical Management of Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors
Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2004; 25(3): 458 - 511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. Boltze, J. Mundschenk, N. Unger, R. Schneider-Stock, B. Peters, C. Mawrin, C. Hoang-Vu, A. Roessner, and H. Lehnert
Expression Profile of the Telomeric Complex Discriminates between Benign and Malignant Pheochromocytoma
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2003; 88(9): 4280 - 4286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. Yon, J. Guillemot, M. Montero-Hadjadje, L. Grumolato, J. Leprince, H. Lefebvre, V. Contesse, P.-F. Plouin, H. Vaudry, and Y. Anouar
Identification of the Secretogranin II-Derived Peptide EM66 in Pheochromocytomas as a Potential Marker for Discriminating Benign Versus Malignant Tumors
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2003; 88(6): 2579 - 2585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
L. Taupenot, K. L. Harper, and D. T. O'Connor
The Chromogranin-Secretogranin Family
N. Engl. J. Med., March 20, 2003; 348(12): 1134 - 1149.
[Full Text] [PDF]