This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Data Supplement Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Allen, K. Articles by Izzo, J. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Allen, K. Articles by Izzo, J. L., Jr Related Collections Clinical Studies Behavioral/psychosocial - treatment Cardiovascular Pharmacology

(Hypertension. 2001;38:815.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.

Scientific Contributions

Pet Ownership, but Not ACE Inhibitor Therapy, Blunts Home Blood Pressure Responses to Mental Stress

Karen Allen; Barbara E. Shykoff; Joseph L. Izzo, Jr

From the Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo.

Correspondence to Karen Allen, PhD, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo, Millard Fillmore Hospital, 3 Gates Circle, Buffalo, NY 14209. E-mail kmallen{at}acsu.buffalo.edu

Abstract—— In the present study, we evaluated the effect of a nonevaluative social support intervention (pet ownership) on blood pressure response to mental stress before and during ACE inhibitor therapy. Forty-eight hypertensive individuals participated in an experiment at home and in the physician’s office. Participants were randomized to an experimental group with assignment of pet ownership in addition to lisinopril (20 mg/d) or to a control group with only lisinopril (20 mg/d). On each study day, blood pressure, heart rate, and plasma renin activity were recorded at baseline and after each mental stressor (serial subtraction and speech). Before drug therapy, mean responses to mental stress did not differ significantly between experimental and control groups in heart rate (94 [SD 6.8] versus 93 [6.8] bpm), systolic blood pressure (182 [8.0] versus 181 [8.3] mm Hg), diastolic blood pressure (120 [6.6] versus 119 [7.9] mm Hg), or plasma renin activity (9.4 [0.59] versus 9.3 [0.57] ng · mL^-1 · h^-1). Lisinopril therapy lowered resting blood pressure by 35/20 mm Hg in both groups, but responses to mental stress were significantly lower among pet owners relative to those who only received lisinopril (P<0.0001; heart rate 81 [6.3] versus 91 [6.5] bpm, systolic blood pressure 131 [6.8] versus 141 [7.8] mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure 92 [6.3] versus 100 [6.8] mm Hg, and plasma renin activity 13.9 [0.92] versus 16.1 [0.58] ng · mL^-1 · h^-1). We conclude that ACE inhibitor therapy alone lowers resting blood pressure, whereas increased social support through pet ownership lowers blood pressure response to mental stress.

Key Words: blood pressure • social support • stress • lifestyle • pets

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. M. Cole, A. Gawlinski, N. Steers, and J. Kotlerman Animal-Assisted Therapy in Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure Am. J. Crit. Care., November 1, 2007; 16(6): 575 - 585. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L. Morrison Health Benefits of Animal-Assisted Interventions Complementary Health Practice Review, January 1, 2007; 12(1): 51 - 62. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Cook, M. Togni, M. C. Schaub, P. Wenaweser, and O. M. Hess High heart rate: a cardiovascular risk factor? Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2006; 27(20): 2387 - 2393. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. H.K. Vogel, S. F. Bolling, R. B. Costello, E. M. Guarneri, M. W. Krucoff, J. C. Longhurst, B. Olshansky, K. R. Pelletier, C. M. Tracy, R. A. Vogel, et al. Integrating Complementary Medicine Into Cardiovascular Medicine: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents (Writing Committee to Develop an Expert Consensus Document on Complementary and Integrative Medicine) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 5, 2005; 46(1): 184 - 221. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. T. Barker On the Edge or not?: Opportunities for Interdisciplinary Scholars in Business Communication to Focus on the Individual and Organizational Benefits of Companion Animals in the Workplace Journal of Business Communication, July 1, 2005; 42(3): 299 - 315. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. M. Beck and A. H. Katcher Future Directions in Human-Animal Bond Research American Behavioral Scientist, September 1, 2003; 47(1): 79 - 93. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. N. Mayorov and G. A. Head AT1 Receptors in the RVLM Mediate Pressor Responses to Emotional Stress in Rabbits Hypertension, May 1, 2003; 41(5): 1168 - 1173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Allen, J. Blascovich, and W. B. Mendes Cardiovascular Reactivity and the Presence of Pets, Friends, and Spouses: The Truth About Cats and Dogs Psychosom Med, September 1, 2002; 64(5): 727 - 739. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]