Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2002;39:897-902
doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000013862.13962.1D
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Muntner, P.
Right arrow Articles by Whelton, P. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Muntner, P.
Right arrow Articles by Whelton, P. K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other hypertension
Right arrow Other Treatment
Right arrow Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs

(Hypertension. 2002;39:897.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.


Scientific Contributions

The Impact of JNC-VI Guidelines on Treatment Recommendations in the US Population

Paul Muntner; Jiang He; Edward J. Roccella; Paul K. Whelton

From the Department of Epidemiology (P.M., J.H., P.K.W.), Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, and Department of Medicine (J.H., P.K.W.) Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, La; and National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (E.J.R.), Bethesda, Md.

Correspondence to Paul Muntner, Department of Epidemiology, Tulane University SPHTM, 1430 Tulane Ave, SL-18, New Orleans, LA 70112. E-mail pmuntner{at}tulane.edu

Using epidemiological and clinical trial evidence, the sixth report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC-VI) updated previous guidelines to suggest that in addition to blood pressure, decisions on initial treatment should emphasize absolute cardiovascular disease risk. We estimated the impact of using cardiovascular disease risk on treatment recommendations for the US population using data from 16 527 participants in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. In the US population >=20 years of age, 36% (62 million) had high-normal blood pressure or greater (systolic/diastolic blood pressure >=130 mm Hg/>=85 mm Hg) or were taking antihypertensive medication. Of this population, 5.1% (3.2 million) were stratified into risk group A (no cardiovascular disease risk factors or prevalent cardiovascular disease), 66.3% (41.4 million) into risk group B (>=1 major risk factor), and 28.6% (17.9 million) into risk group C (diabetes mellitus, clinical cardiovascular disease, target organ damage). Also, 26% of this group (16.2 million) had high-normal blood pressure and were in risk groups A or B, a context in which vigorous lifestyle modification is recommended in the JNC-VI guidelines. Additionally, 11% (7.0 million) had high-normal blood pressure (systolic/diastolic, 130 to 139 mm Hg/85 to 89 mm Hg, respectively) or stage-1 hypertension (140 to 159 mm Hg/90 to 99 mm Hg), and at least 1 factor, placing them in risk group C, but they were not currently on antihypertensive medication. JNC-VI, but not previous JNC guidelines, specifically recommends drug therapy as initial treatment for these patients. We conclude that JNC-VI refines cardiovascular risk and enfranchises more Americans to undertake more aggressive risk reduction maneuvers.


Key Words: guidelines • treatment • drug therapy • lifestyle




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
L. Tolkin, M. Bursztyn, I. Z. Ben-Dov, N. Simanovsky, and N. Hiller
Incidental renal artery calcifications: a study of 350 consecutive abdominal computed tomography scans
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2009; 24(7): 2170 - 2175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
West J Nurs ResHome page
H. Cakir and R. Pinar
Randomized Controlled Trial on Lifestyle Modification in Hypertensive Patients
West J Nurs Res, March 1, 2006; 28(2): 190 - 209.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Arnlov, M. J. Pencina, B.-H. Nam, J. B. Meigs, C. S. Fox, D. Levy, R. B. D'Agostino, and R. S. Vasan
Relations of Insulin Sensitivity to Longitudinal Blood Pressure Tracking: Variations With Baseline Age, Body Mass Index, and Blood Pressure
Circulation, September 20, 2005; 112(12): 1719 - 1727.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
J. R. Banegas, J. Segura, L. M. Ruilope, M. Luque, R. Garcia-Robles, C. Campo, F. Rodriguez-Artalejo, J. Tamargo, and on behalf of the CLUE Study Group Investigators
Blood Pressure Control and Physician Management of Hypertension in Hospital Hypertension Units in Spain
Hypertension, June 1, 2004; 43(6): 1338 - 1344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
D. W. Jones and J. E. Hall
Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure and Evidence From New Hypertension Trials
Hypertension, January 1, 2004; 43(1): 1 - 3.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
Writing Group of the PREMIER Collaborative Researc
Effects of Comprehensive Lifestyle Modification on Blood Pressure Control: Main Results of the PREMIER Clinical Trial
JAMA, April 23, 2003; 289(16): 2083 - 2093.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]