This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 40/6/817    most recent 01.HYP.0000038731.19106.D1v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bur, A. Articles by Hirschl, M. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bur, A. Articles by Hirschl, M. M. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information High Blood Pressure Related Collections Clinical Studies

(Hypertension. 2002;40:817.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.

Scientific Contributions

Classification of Blood Pressure Levels by Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Hypertension

Andreas Bur; Harald Herkner; Marianne Vlcek; Christian Woisetschläger; Ulla Derhaschnig; Michael M. Hirschl

From the Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Correspondence to Michael M. Hirschl, MD, Department of Emergency Medicine, General Hospital, Waehringer Guertel 18–20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. E-mail michael.hirschl{at}akh-wien.ac.at

Whereas clinic blood pressure (CBP) above normality is divided into stages, no corresponding classifications are available for 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (ABP). We conducted a study (1) to define stages of hypertension by ABP corresponding to CBP stages and (2) to evaluate if these stages have prognostic impact similar to CBP stages. Seven hundred thirty-six hypertensive patients were included. Mean systolic blood pressure was 149±15.2/87±8.6 mm Hg for CBP and 135±13/79±9.7 mm Hg for ABP. The mean bias between both methods was -13.3 mm Hg (95% CI, -14.3 to -12.2; 1.96xSD limits of agreement, 15.7 to -42.3) and -7.3 mm Hg (95% CI, -7.9 to -6.6; 1.96xSD limits of agreement, 9.8 to -24.3) for systolic and diastolic blood pressure (P>0.0001 for both), respectively. Classification of hypertension by ABP revealed lower cutoff values for the different stages of hypertension compared with the corresponding cutoff values for CBP (CBP versus ABP: 140/90 versus 132/81 mm Hg; 160/100 versus 140/88 mm Hg; 180/110 versus 148/94 mm Hg, P<0.001). Overall, 82 (11.1%) patients had nonfatal clinical cardiovascular events and 9 (1.2%) patients died of a cardiovascular cause during follow-up. The distribution of cardiovascular events was significantly associated with increasing ABP value (P<0.006). Staging of hypertension by ABP may facilitate the use of this method in daily clinical practice, as ABP can now be used not only to confirm the diagnosis of hypertension but also to assess the severity and prognosis of hypertensive disease.

Key Words: hypertension, arterial • hypertension, essential • blood pressure • diastole • blood pressure monitoring, ambulatory • systole

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Parati and G. Mancia Hypertension Staging Through Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Hypertension, December 1, 2002; 40(6): 792 - 794. [Full Text] [PDF]