This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 44/5/602    most recent 01.HYP.0000144100.29945.5ev1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Milchak, J. L. Articles by Ardery, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Milchak, J. L. Articles by Ardery, G. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information High Blood Pressure Related Collections Other hypertension Compliance/Adherence

(Hypertension. 2004;44:602.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.

Brief Reviews

Measuring Adherence to Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension

An Evaluation of the Literature

From the Division of Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy (J.L.M., B.L.C., G.A.), College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, and the Department of Family Medicine (B.L.C., P.A.J., G.A.), Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City.

Correspondence to Barry L. Carter, PharmD, Professor and Head, Division of Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Department of Family Medicine, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242. E-mail barry-carter{at}uiowa.edu

Adherence to practice guidelines is frequently used as a measure of quality of care. Numerous studies have evaluated physician adherence to hypertension guidelines by prescription data, physician survey data, or medical record review. However, most have methodological limitations that might underestimate physician adherence. Accurate and meaningful characterization of adherence rests on evaluation of varied components of hypertension care, use of explicit validated performance measures, incorporation of implicit and explicit review, and linkage of process measures to blood pressure outcomes.

Key Words: hypertension, detection and control • population • lifestyle • epidemiology

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. L. Carter Antihypertensive Prescribing: Do We Have Reason to Celebrate? Hypertension, November 1, 2006; 48(5): 816 - 817. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Onysko, C. Maxwell, M. Eliasziw, J. X. Zhang, H. Johansen, N. R.C. Campbell, and for the Canadian Hypertension Education Program Large Increases in Hypertension Diagnosis and Treatment in Canada After a Healthcare Professional Education Program Hypertension, November 1, 2006; 48(5): 853 - 860. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. R.C. Campbell, K. Tu, R. Brant, M. Duong-Hua, F. A. McAlister, and for the Canadian Hypertension Education Program Ou The Impact of the Canadian Hypertension Education Program on Antihypertensive Prescribing Trends Hypertension, January 1, 2006; 47(1): 22 - 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. J. Wang and R. S. Vasan Epidemiology of Uncontrolled Hypertension in the United States Circulation, September 13, 2005; 112(11): 1651 - 1662. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Tu, N. R.C. Campbell, M. Duong-Hua, and F. A. McAlister Hypertension Management in the Elderly Has Improved: Ontario Prescribing Trends, 1994 to 2002 Hypertension, June 1, 2005; 45(6): 1113 - 1118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]