Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2005;45:880-886
Published online before print April 4, 2005, doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000161880.59963.da
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
45/5/880    most recent
01.HYP.0000161880.59963.dav1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doulton, T. W.R.
Right arrow Articles by MacGregor, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doulton, T. W.R.
Right arrow Articles by MacGregor, G. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Clinical Studies

(Hypertension. 2005;45:880.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Articles

Systematic Review of Combined Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition and Angiotensin Receptor Blockade in Hypertension

Timothy W.R. Doulton; Feng J. He; Graham A. MacGregor

From the Blood Pressure Unit, Department of Cardiac and Vascular Sciences, St. George’s Hospital Medical School, London, UK.

Correspondence to Professor Graham A. MacGregor, Blood Pressure Unit, Department of Vascular and Cardiovascular Sciences, St. George’s Hospital Medical School, London, SW17 0RE, UK. E-mail gmacgreg{at}sghms.ac.uk

Some evidence suggests that long-term angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition may become less effective, thereby increasing angiotensin II levels, which could be inhibited by the addition of an angiotensin receptor blocker. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized trials with searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Overall, the combination of an ACE inhibitor and an angiotensin receptor blocker reduced ambulatory blood pressure by 4.7/3.0 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.9 to 6.5/1.6 to 4.3) compared with ACE inhibitor monotherapy and 3.8/2.9 mm Hg (2.4 to 5.3/0.4 to 5.4) compared with angiotensin receptor blocker monotherapy. Clinic blood pressure was reduced by 3.8/2.7 mm Hg (0.9 to 6.7/0.8 to 4.6) and 3.7/2.3 mm Hg (0.4 to 6.9/0.2 to 4.4) compared with ACE inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker, respectively. However, the majority of these studies used submaximal doses or once-daily dosing of shorter-acting ACE inhibitors and, when a larger dose of shorter-acting ACE inhibitor was given or a longer-acting ACE inhibitor was used, there was generally no additive effect of the angiotensin receptor blocker on blood pressure. Proteinuria was reduced by the combination compared with ACE inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker monotherapy, an effect that was independent of blood pressure in several studies, suggesting that the combination could have benefits in proteinuric nephropathies. None of the studies was of sufficient size and duration to determine whether there may be safety concerns. In conclusion, although there is a small additive effect on blood pressure with an ACE inhibitor-angiotensin receptor blocker combination, the routine use of this combination in uncomplicated hypertension is not recommended until more carefully controlled studies are performed.


Key Words: angiotensin-converting enzyme • hypertension • meta-analysis • proteinuria • receptors, angiotensin • renin-angiotensin system




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
M. Bohm, F. Mahfoud, C. Werner, K. Teo, and M. Baumhakel
Cardiovascular protection: a breakthrough for high-risk patients
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2009; 11(suppl_F): F19 - F26.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
R. Haynes, P. Mason, K. Rahimi, and M. J Landray
Dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin system: are two better than one?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 17, 2009; (2009) gfp458v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ther Adv Cardiovasc DisHome page
J. A. Jessup, B. M. Westwood, M. C. Chappell, and L. Groban
Dual ACE-inhibition and AT1 receptor antagonism improves ventricular lusitropy without affecting cardiac fibrosis in the congenic mRen2.Lewis rat
Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, August 1, 2009; 3(4): 245 - 257.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone SystemHome page
T. Berl
Review: Renal protection by inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, March 1, 2009; 10(1): 1 - 8.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
F. H. Messerli
The sudden demise of dual renin-angiotensin system blockade or the soft science of the surrogate end point.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 10, 2009; 53(6): 468 - 470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
M. M. de Resende, S. L. Amaral, C. Moreno, and A. S. Greene
Congenic strains reveal the effect of the renin gene on skeletal muscle angiogenesis induced by electrical stimulation
Physiol Genomics, October 8, 2008; 33(1): 33 - 40.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ther Adv Cardiovasc DisHome page
C. Schindler
ACE-inhibitor, AT1-receptor-antagonist, or both? A clinical pharmacologist`s perspective after publication of the results of ONTARGET
Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, August 1, 2008; 2(4): 233 - 248.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
M. Mrkobrada, H. Thiessen-Philbrook, R. B. Haynes, A. V. Iansavichus, F. Rehman, and A. X. Garg
Need for Quality Improvement in Renal Systematic Reviews
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2008; 3(4): 1102 - 1114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
A. B. Chapman
Approaches to Testing New Treatments in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: Insights from the CRISP and HALT-PKD Studies
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2008; 3(4): 1197 - 1204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
S. L. Linas
Are Two Better Than One? Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors Plus Angiotensin Receptor Blockers for Reducing Blood Pressure and Proteinuria in Kidney Disease
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2008; 3(Supplement_1): S17 - S23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
W. W. M. Saweirs and J. Goddard
What are the best treatments for early chronic kidney disease?: A Background Paper prepared for the UK Consensus Conference on Early Chronic Kidney Disease
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2007; 22(suppl_9): ix31 - ix38.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
W. B.A. Eijkelkamp, Z. Zhang, G. Remuzzi, H.-H. Parving, M. E. Cooper, W. F. Keane, S. Shahinfar, G. W. Gleim, M. R. Weir, B. M. Brenner, et al.
Albuminuria Is a Target for Renoprotective Therapy Independent from Blood Pressure in Patients with Type 2 Diabetic Nephropathy: Post Hoc Analysis from the Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) Trial
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2007; 18(5): 1540 - 1546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
N. Khosla and G. Bakris
Lessons Learned from Recent Hypertension Trials about Kidney Disease
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2006; 1(2): 229 - 235.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes Spectr.Home page
B. Stults and R. E. Jones
Management of Hypertension in Diabetes
Diabetes Spectr, January 1, 2006; 19(1): 25 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular DiseaseHome page
R. Donnelly
Review: Managing cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes
The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease, November 1, 2005; 5(6): 325 - 329.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
F. A Snyder
Drug combinations and all cause mortality in heart disease: Dosages and types of ACE inhibitors need to be known
BMJ, July 16, 2005; 331(7509): 159 - 159.
[Full Text]