Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2006;47:29-34
Published online before print December 12, 2005, doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000197195.84725.66
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
47/1/29    most recent
01.HYP.0000197195.84725.66v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krakoff, L. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krakoff, L. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Clinical Studies

(Hypertension. 2006;47:29.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Articles

Cost-Effectiveness of Ambulatory Blood Pressure

A Reanalysis

Lawrence R. Krakoff

From the Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Englewood Hospital and Medical Center, Englewood, NJ.

Correspondence to Lawrence R Krakoff, Department of Medicine, Englewood Hospital and Medical Center, 350 Engle St, Englewood NJ 07631. E-mail Lawrence.Krakoff{at}ehmc.com

Accurate diagnosis of hypertension and prognosis for future cardiovascular events can be enhanced through the use of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. It has been suggested that the use of ambulatory monitoring as a secondary screening for hypertension might be cost-effective. Many needed studies that are related to the calculation of cost-effectiveness for ambulatory monitoring have become available in recent years. More accurate estimates for cost of care, costs for testing, prevalence of white-coat hypertension, and incidence of the transition from normal pressures to hypertension have been reported. This study presents calculations of the cost savings likely to take place when ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is implemented for newly detected hypertensive subjects. These calculations are based on current estimates for cost of testing, cost of treatment, prevalence of white-coat hypertension at baseline, and varying the incidence of new hypertension after the initial screening. The results indicate a potential savings of 3% to 14% for cost of care for hypertension and 10% to 23% reduction in treatment days when ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is incorporated into the diagnostic process. At current reimbursement rates, the cost of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring for secondary screening on an annual basis would be <10% of treatment costs. Calculated savings for use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring can take place when annual treatment costs are as little as $300. These estimates should be considered for the management of recently detected hypertension, especially when the risk of future cardiovascular is disease is low.


Key Words: ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, ambulatory • hypertension, white-coat • cost benefit analysis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
E. O'Brien
Response to Prevalence and Risk Factors of Masked Hypertension Identified by Multiple Self-Blood Pressure Measurement
Hypertension, November 1, 2008; 52(5): e139 - e139.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
E. Urbina, B. Alpert, J. Flynn, L. Hayman, G. A. Harshfield, M. Jacobson, L. Mahoney, B. McCrindle, M. Mietus-Snyder, J. Steinberger, et al.
Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Children and Adolescents: Recommendations for Standard Assessment: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Atherosclerosis, Hypertension, and Obesity in Youth Committee of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young and the Council for High Blood Pressure Research
Hypertension, September 1, 2008; 52(3): 433 - 451.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
T. G. Pickering, N. H. Miller, G. Ogedegbe, L. R. Krakoff, N. T. Artinian, and D. Goff
Call to Action on Use and Reimbursement for Home Blood Pressure Monitoring: A Joint Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association, American Society of Hypertension, and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association
Hypertension, July 1, 2008; 52(1): 10 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
E. O'Brien
Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement: The Case for Implementation in Primary Care
Hypertension, June 1, 2008; 51(6): 1435 - 1441.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
K. Chavanu, J. Merkel, and A. M. Quan
Role of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the management of hypertension
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., February 1, 2008; 65(3): 209 - 218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
T. G. Pickering, D. Shimbo, and D. Haas
Ambulatory blood-pressure monitoring.
N. Engl. J. Med., June 1, 2006; 354(22): 2368 - 2374.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
W. B. White
Expanding the Use of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Hypertension
Hypertension, January 1, 2006; 47(1): 14 - 15.
[Full Text] [PDF]