Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2006;47:35-38
Published online before print December 12, 2005, doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000196686.85286.9c
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
47/1/35    most recent
01.HYP.0000196686.85286.9cv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beckman, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gerhard-Herman, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beckman, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gerhard-Herman, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other diagnostic testing
Right arrow Pathophysiology
Right arrow Other arteriosclerosis

(Hypertension. 2006;47:35.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Articles

Automated Oscillometric Determination of the Ankle–Brachial Index Provides Accuracy Necessary for Office Practice

Joshua A. Beckman; Caitlin O. Higgins; Marie Gerhard-Herman

From the Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

Correspondence to Joshua A. Beckman, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail jbeckman{at}partners.org

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) remains underdiagnosed by primary care and cardiovascular physicians. The office-based assessment of PAD is limited by the need for specialized equipment and the time required for performance of the ankle–brachial index (ABI). We explored whether the accuracy of automated ABI measurement by oscillometry compared favorably with the gold-standard method using continuous-wave Doppler ultrasound. Consecutive patients referred to our university hospital noninvasive vascular laboratory for ABI measurement were invited for participation. Of 205 patients, 201 participated, including 55 with PAD. The ABI was measured by automated oscillometry and Doppler ultrasound. The test of trends revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.78 in the left leg and 0.78 in the right leg (P<0.01 for both). The mean ABI difference between methods was 0.04±0.01 and 0.06±0.01, respectively, in the left and right legs. The differences between the methods followed a normal distribution. Oscillometric determination of the ABI provides an accurate determination of the ABI in an outpatient population. Our findings show automated oscillometry to be a reliable and easier method of ABI measurement, lowering the barrier to incorporation of this diagnostic test into clinical practice.


Key Words: vascular diseases • atherosclerosis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.Home page
J. S. Wrobel and D. G. Armstrong
Reliability and Validity of Current Physical Examination Techniques of the Foot and Ankle
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, May 1, 2008; 98(3): 197 - 206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]