This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 47/4/771    most recent 01.HYP.0000209642.11448.e0v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Smith, R. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Smith, R. D. Related Collections Clinical Studies Related Article

(Hypertension. 2006;47:771.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Articles

Value of Noninvasive Hemodynamics to Achieve Blood Pressure Control in Hypertensive Subjects

Ronald D. Smith; Pavel Levy; Carlos M. Ferrario for the Consideration of Noninvasive Hemodynamic Monitoring to Target Reduction of Blood Pressure Levels Study Group

From the Hypertension and Vascular Disease Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.

Correspondence to Carlos Ferrario, Hypertension and Vascular Disease Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1032. E-mail cferrari{at}wfubmc.edu

Abnormal hemodynamics play a central role in the development and perpetuation of high blood pressure. We hypothesized that hypertension therapy guided by noninvasive hemodynamics with impedance cardiography could aid primary care physicians in reducing blood pressure more effectively. Uncontrolled hypertensive patients on 1 to 3 medications were randomized by 3:2 ratio to either a standard arm or hemodynamic arm that used impedance cardiography (BioZ, CardioDynamics). Each patient completed 5 study visits with a 2-week washout period followed by 3 months of treatment. A total of 164 patients from 11 centers completed the study, 95 in the standard arm and 69 in the hemodynamic arm. At baseline and after washout, there were no differences between arms in number of medications or demographic, blood pressure, or hemodynamic characteristics. Systolic blood pressure reductions in the hemodynamic arm were greater from baseline (19 mm Hg versus 11 mm Hg; P<0.01) and after washout (25 mm Hg versus 19 mm Hg; P<0.05). Diastolic blood pressure reductions were also greater in the hemodynamic arm from baseline (12 mm Hg versus 5 mm Hg; P<0.001) and after washout (17 mm Hg versus 10 mm Hg; P<0.001). The hemodynamic arm achieved goal blood pressure (<140/90 mm Hg) more frequently (77% versus 57%; P<0.01) and a more aggressive blood pressure level (<130/85 mm Hg) more frequently (55% versus 27%; P<0.0001). These study results indicate that antihypertensive therapy guided by impedance cardiography in uncontrolled hypertensive patients on 1 medications is more effective than standard care.

Key Words: hemodynamics • cardiac output • vascular resistance • hypertension, arterial • hypertension, essential • blood pressure

Related Article:

Noninvasive Hemodynamic Measurements: An Important Advance in Individualizing Drug Therapies for Hypertensive Patients

John M. Flack
Hypertension 2006 47: 646-647. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. M. Ferrario, J. Basile, W. Bestermann, E. Frohlich, M. Houston, D. T. Lackland, R. D. Smith, and D. L. Wise Review: The role of noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring in the evaluation and treatment of hypertension Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, December 1, 2007; 1(2): 113 - 118. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. J. Mann Reduction of Blood Pressure Levels Study Group Hypertension, November 1, 2006; 48(5): e104 - e104. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Flack Noninvasive Hemodynamic Measurements: An Important Advance in Individualizing Drug Therapies for Hypertensive Patients Hypertension, April 1, 2006; 47(4): 646 - 647. [Full Text] [PDF]