This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 48/3/392    most recent 01.HYP.0000236507.76042.72v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Simon, A. Articles by Levenson, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Simon, A. Articles by Levenson, J. Related Collections Primary prevention Risk Factors Other arteriosclerosis Imaging Epidemiology

(Hypertension. 2006;48:392.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Articles

Performance of Subclinical Arterial Disease Detection as a Screening Test for Coronary Heart Disease

From the Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou (site Broussais), Centre de Médecine Préventive Cardiovasculaire, Université René Descartes-Faculté de Médecine Paris, Paris 5, France.

Correspondence to Alain Simon, Centre de Médecine Préventive Cardiovasculaire, Hôpital Broussais, 96 rue Didot, 75674, Paris Cedex 14, France. E-mail: alain.simon{at}brs.ap-hop-paris.fr

Traditional risk factors are poor screening tests for coronary heart disease, whereas clinical arterial disease represents its strongest predictor. This raises the question whether subclinical arterial disease may also predict coronary disease. Using published data of prospective studies of subclinical arterial disease, we calculated the incidence of coronary event associated with the absence or presence of atherosclerosis as defined by dichotomous characterization of the following markers: low or high intima-media thickness or the absence or presence of plaque, assessed by carotid ultrasound; zero or high total coronary artery calcium score assessed by computed tomography; normal or decreased ankle-arm index pressure assessed by Doppler stethoscope; and low or high aortic pulse wave velocity assessed by mecanography. A dose-response relationship was found between the absence and presence of atherosclerosis and coronary event incidence. Yearly incidence was <1% in the absence of atherosclerosis regardless of the marker used. Coronary event incidence was >1% in the presence of atherosclerosis and increased in a gradual way, depending on the marker tested, to reach 3% maximum with massive coronary calcifications. The relation between clinically overt arterial disease, such as angina, transient ischemic attack, stroke, or myocardial infarct, and yearly incidence of subsequent events reported in the literature prolonged the dose-response curve of subclinical disease. Therefore, detection of arterial disease, not only clinically overt but also subclinical asymptomatic, is a worthwhile screening test for future coronary event.

Key Words: risk factors • coronary heart disease • intima-media thickness • coronary calcium • plaque • arterial stiffness • prevention

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Simon, G. Chironi, and J. Levenson Comparative performance of subclinical atherosclerosis tests in predicting coronary heart disease in asymptomatic individuals Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2007; 28(24): 2967 - 2971. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Simon and G. Chironi The relationship between carotid intima-media thickness and coronary atherosclerosis revisited Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2007; 28(17): 2049 - 2050. [Full Text] [PDF]