Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1983;5:916-926

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aylward, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by West, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aylward, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by West, M. J.

Hypertension, Vol 5, 916-926, Copyright © 1983 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Baroreflex control of myocardial contractility in conscious normotensive and renal hypertensive rabbits

PE Aylward, RJ McRitchie, JP Chalmers and MJ West

We have assessed resting myocardial contractility and its baroreflex control in normotensive and hypertensive conscious rabbits. Hypertension was induced by bilateral cellophane wrapping of the kidneys with experiments performed 6 weeks later during the established phase of hypertension. The peak rate of change of left ventricular pressure (peak LV dP/dt) was used as the index of myocardial contractility. Baroreflex control of contractility and heart period (HP) was assessed by constructing stimulus response curves relating change in mean arterial pressure (MAP), induced by balloon occluders around the abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava, to change in peak LV dP/dt and HP. These stimulus response curves were obtained in normotensive rabbits with and without cardiac pacing, and in both normotensive and hypertensive animals after cardiac beta sympathetic blockade with propranolol, vagal blockade with methylscopolamine, and combined cardiac autonomic blockade with propranolol and scopolamine, as well as in rabbits with intact autonomic effectors. Resting MAP was significantly higher in the hypertensive rabbits (119 +/- 2 mm Hg) compared to normotensive controls (76 +/- 1 mm Hg). Resting peak LV dP/dt was also greater by 51% in the hypertensive animals (7054 +/- 287 mm Hg sec-1) compared to controls (4690 +/- 223 mm Hg sec-1). There was no significant difference in the resting heart period or resting left ventricular end diastolic pressure. Transient changes in MAP induced by occlusion of the aortic or venous balloons produced significant alterations in peak LV dP/dt in normotensive animals with and without pacing and in hypertensive control animals. In animals with cardiac sympathetic block, the range and slope or sensitivity of the stimulus response curves were not significantly changed but in animals with vagal blockade the sensitivity was reduced by 90% and the range at 30 mm Hg by 88%. After propranolol and methylscopolamine were administered together, the stimulus no longer evoked a response. These experiments demonstrate that myocardial contractility is under baroreflex control and suggest that this is mediated principally via parasympathetic nerves to the heart. There was no significant difference between the sensitivity of baroreflex control of myocardial contractility in the normotensive (-84 +/- 14 mm Hg sec-1 per mm Hg) and the hypertensive (- 110 +/- 14 mm Hg sec-1 per mm Hg) rabbits, unlike the baroreflex control of heart period where sensitivity was markedly impaired in the hypertensive (sensitivity 3.8 +/- 0.8 msec/mm Hg) compared to the normotensive (6.9 +/- 1.0 msec/mm Hg) animals.