This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 50/1/181    most recent HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.089763v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wang, J.-G. Articles by Safar, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wang, J.-G. Articles by Safar, M. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Hazardous Substances DB AMLODIPINE BESYLATE Medline Plus Health Information Blood Pressure Medicines Coronary Artery Disease Diabetic Kidney Problems Heart Attack High Blood Pressure Stroke Related Collections Primary prevention Clinical Studies

(Hypertension. 2007;50:181.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.

Sixth International Workshop on Structure and Function of the Vascular System

Prevention of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction by Amlodipine and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers

A Quantitative Overview

Ji-Guang Wang; Yan Li; Stanley S. Franklin; Michel Safar

From the Centre for Epidemiological Studies and Clinical Trials (J.G.W., Y.L.), Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Preventive Cardiology Program (S.S.F.), University of California, Irvine; and the Diagnosis Center (M.S.), Hopital Hotel-Dieu, Paris, France.

Correspondence to Ji-Guang Wang, Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Ruijin 2nd Rd 197, Shanghai 200025, China. E-mail jiguangwang{at}netscape.net

In the present quantitative overview of outcome trials, we investigated the efficacy of amlodipine or angiotensin receptor blockers in the prevention of stroke and myocardial infarction in patients with hypertension, coronary artery disease, or diabetic nephropathy. The analysis included 12 trials of 94 338 patients. The analysis of trials involving an amlodipine group showed that amlodipine provided more protection against stroke and myocardial infarction than other antihypertensive drugs, including angiotensin receptor blockers (–19%, P<0.0001 and –7%, P=0.03) and placebo (–37%, P=0.06 and –29%, P=0.04). The analysis of trials involving an angiotensin receptor blocker group showed contrasting results between trials versus amlodipine and trials versus other antihypertensive drugs for stroke (+19% versus –25%; P<0.0001) and myocardial infarction (+21% versus +1%; P=0.03). The results of 3 trials comparing an angiotensin receptor blocker with placebo were neutral (P0.14). The within-trial between-group difference in achieved systolic pressure ranged from –1.1 to +4.7 mm Hg for trials involving an amlodipine group and from –2.8 to +4.0 mm Hg for trials involving an angiotensin receptor blocker group. The metaregression analysis correlating odds ratios with blood pressure differences showed a negative relationship (regression coefficients: –3% to –8%), which reached statistical significance (regression coefficient: –6%; P=0.01) for stroke in trials involving an amlodipine group. In conclusion, blood pressure differences largely accounted for cardiovascular outcome.

Key Words: blood pressure • clinical trial • calcium channel blocker • angiotensin receptor blocker • stroke • myocardial infarction

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J.-L. Balligand and T. Godfraind Amlodipine and Stroke Prevention Hypertension, October 1, 2007; 50(4): e71 - e71. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-G. Wang and Y. Li Response to Amlodipine and Stroke Prevention Hypertension, October 1, 2007; 50(4): e72 - e72. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Minami, T. Ishimitsu, and H. Matsuoka Can Large-Scale Trials or Meta-Analyses Demonstrate Blood Pressure Independent Effect of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers? Hypertension, October 1, 2007; 50(4): e73 - e73. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-G. Wang and Y. Li Response to Can Large-Scale Trials or Meta-Analyses Demonstrate Blood Pressure Independent Effect of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers? Hypertension, October 1, 2007; 50(4): e74 - e74. [Full Text] [PDF]