Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2007;50:1019-1025
Published online before print October 15, 2007, doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.094193
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the course for this article:
Hypertension: December 2007,Volume 50, Number 6
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
50/6/1019    most recent
HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.094193v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow patientINFORMation
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verberk, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Verberk, W. J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Blood Pressure Medicines
*High Blood Pressure
Related Collections
Right arrow Compliance/Adherence
Right arrow Primary prevention
Right arrow Clinical Studies
Right arrow Echocardiography
Right arrow Other diagnostic testing

(Hypertension. 2007;50:1019.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Articles

Self-Measurement of Blood Pressure at Home Reduces the Need for Antihypertensive Drugs

A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Willem J. Verberk; Abraham A. Kroon; Jacques W.M. Lenders; Alfons G.H. Kessels; Gert A. van Montfrans; Andries J. Smit; Paul-Hugo M. van der Kuy; Patricia J. Nelemans; Roger J.M.W. Rennenberg; Diederick E. Grobbee; Frank W. Beltman; Manuela A. Joore; Daniëlle E.M. Brunenberg; Carmen Dirksen; Theo Thien; Peter W. de Leeuw for the Home Versus Office Measurement, Reduction of Unnecessary Treatment Study Investigators

From the Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University, and the Departments of Internal Medicine (W.J.V., A.A.K., R.J.M.W.R., P.W.d.L.), Medical Technology Assessment and Epidemiology (A.G.H.K., M.A.J., D.E.M.B., C.D.), Clinical Epidemiology (P.J.N.), and Clinical Pharmacy (P.-H.M.v.d.K.), University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of General Internal Medicine (J.W.M.L., T.T.), Medical Center, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine (G.A.v.M.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Departments of Internal Medicine (A.J.S.) and General Practice (F.W.B.), University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; and the Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Health Care (D.E.G.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Correspondence to Willem J. Verberk, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Maastricht, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands. E-mail willem.verberk{at}intmed.unimaas.nl

It is still uncertain whether one can safely base treatment decisions on self-measurement of blood pressure. In the present study, we investigated whether antihypertensive treatment based on self-measurement of blood pressure leads to the use of less medication without the loss of blood pressure control. We randomly assigned 430 hypertensive patients to receive treatment either on the basis of self-measured pressures (n=216) or office pressures (OPs; n=214). During 1-year follow-up, blood pressure was measured by office measurement (10 visits), ambulatory monitoring (start and end), and self-measurement (8 times, self-pressure group only). In addition, drug use, associated costs, and degree of target organ damage (echocardiography and microalbuminuria) were assessed. The self-pressure group used less medication than the OP group (1.47 versus 2.48 drug steps; P<0.001) with lower costs ($3222 versus $4420 per 100 patients per month; P<0.001) but without significant differences in systolic and diastolic OP values (1.6/1.0 mm Hg; P=0.25/0.20), in changes in left ventricular mass index (–6.5 g/m2 versus –5.6 g/m2; P=0.72), or in median urinary microalbumin concentration (–1.7 versus –1.5 mg per 24 hours; P=0.87). Nevertheless, 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure values at the end of the trial were higher in the self-pressure than in the OP group: 125.9 versus 123.8 mm Hg (P<0.05) for systolic and 77.2 versus 76.1 mm Hg (P<0.05) for diastolic blood pressure. These data show that self-measurement leads to less medication use than office blood pressure measurement without leading to significant differences in OP values or target organ damage. Ambulatory values, however, remain slightly elevated for the self-pressure group.


Key Words: blood pressure • hypertension • self-measurements • home monitoring • ambulatory blood pressure measurement • treatment


Find additional patient-related information at:

http://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=3055289


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
G. V. da Silva, S. de Barros, H. Abensur, K. C. Ortega, D. Mion Jr, and Cochrane Renal Group Prospective Trial Register: C
Home blood pressure monitoring in blood pressure control among haemodialysis patients: an open randomized clinical trial
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2009; 24(12): 3805 - 3811.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Telemed TelecareHome page
F. McCant, G. McKoy, J. Grubber, M. K Olsen, E. Oddone, B. Powers, and H. B Bosworth
Feasibility of blood pressure telemonitoring in patients with poor blood pressure control
J Telemed Telecare, September 1, 2009; 15(6): 281 - 285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
G. Parati, S. Omboni, and G. Bilo
Why Is Out-of-Office Blood Pressure Measurement Needed?: Home Blood Pressure Measurements Will Increasingly Replace Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in the Diagnosis and Management of Hypertension
Hypertension, August 1, 2009; 54(2): 181 - 187.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
J. Ishikawa, D. J. Carroll, S. Kuruvilla, J. E. Schwartz, and T. G. Pickering
Changes in Home Versus Clinic Blood Pressure With Antihypertensive Treatments: A Meta-Analysis
Hypertension, November 1, 2008; 52(5): 856 - 864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
T. G. Pickering, N. H. Miller, G. Ogedegbe, L. R. Krakoff, N. T. Artinian, and D. Goff
Call to Action on Use and Reimbursement for Home Blood Pressure Monitoring: A Joint Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association, American Society of Hypertension, and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association
Hypertension, July 1, 2008; 52(1): 10 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]