This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Data Supplement All Versions of this Article: 50/6/1026    most recent HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.097667v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hajjar, I. Articles by Lipsitz, L. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hajjar, I. Articles by Lipsitz, L. A. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Disabilities High Blood Pressure Related Collections Epidemiology Other hypertension

(Hypertension. 2007;50:1026.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Articles

Association Between Concurrent and Remote Blood Pressure and Disability in Older Adults

From the Harvard Medical School (L.A.L., I.H.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Mass; Medical University of South Carolina (D.T.L.), Charleston; and Boston University (L.A.C.), Mass.

Correspondence to Ihab Hajjar, Harvard Medical School, Institute for Aging Research/Hebrew SeniorLife, Division of Gerontology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 1200 Centre St, Boston, MA 29206. E-mail ihabhajjar{at}hrca.harvard.edu

The objective of this study was to investigate the association between blood pressure and disability in older adults. Stroke-free participants in the Charleston Heart Study (n=999, mean age=68.5± 0.2 years SE, 57% women, and 39% African Americans) were followed between 1960 and 1993. Functional measures including Nagi’s Congruency in Medical and Self Assessment of Disability Scale, the Rosow-Breslaw Scale, and Katz’ Activities of Daily Living Scale, in addition to systolic and diastolic blood pressures, were collected in 1984–1985, 1987–1990, and 1990–1993. Additional systolic and diastolic blood pressures from 1960 to 1963 were also available. We defined remote blood pressure change as the change from 1960 to 1984 to 1985 and concurrent blood pressure change as the change from 1984 to 1985 to the follow-up periods. Hypertension was defined as blood pressure 140/90 mm Hg or receiving antihypertensive agents, and it was considered uncontrolled if subjects were receiving antihypertensive agents and blood pressure was 140/90 mm Hg. Greater increases in remote and concurrent systolic blood pressure increases but not diastolic blood pressure were associated with greater declines in all 3 of the functional measures. Participants with hypertension were also at an increased risk for developing new disability (hazard ratio: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.59 for Nagi scale; hazard ratio: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.59 for Rosow-Breslaw Scale; and hazard ratio: 1.3, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.69 for Katz scale). Participants with uncontrolled hypertension were at greatest risk of disability compared with normotensive subjects. In stroke-free older adults, increases in remote and concurrent systolic blood pressure increases are associated with greater functional decline. Older adults with uncontrolled hypertension are at a particularly increased risk for disability.

Key Words: hypertension • disability • blood pressure • aged • Southeast

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. A. Robbins, P. K. Elias, and M. F. Elias Blood Pressure and Disability: First Steps in Future Studies Hypertension, April 1, 2008; 51(4): e25 - e25. [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Hajjar, D. Lackland, L. A. Cupples, and L. A. Lipsitz Response to Blood Pressure and Disability: First Steps in Future Studies Hypertension, April 1, 2008; 51(4): e26 - e26. [Full Text] [PDF]