This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 51/2/203    most recent HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.101014v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Google Scholar Articles by Black, M. A. Articles by Green, D. J. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Black, M. A. Articles by Green, D. J. Related Collections Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide

(Hypertension. 2008;51:203.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Articles

Importance of Measuring the Time Course of Flow-Mediated Dilatation in Humans

From the Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Science (M.A.B., N.T.C., D.H.J.T., D.J.G.), Liverpool John Moore’s University, UK; the Department of Physiology (D.H.J.T.), Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, The Netherlands; and the School of Human Movement and Exercise Science (D.J.G.), The University of Western Australia, Crawley.

Correspondence to Dr Danny Green, Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Science, Henry Cotton Campus, Liverpool John Moores University, 15-21 Webster Street, Liverpool, L3 2ET. E-mail d.j.green{at}ljmu.ac.uk

Flow-mediated dialation (FMD) is widely used to describe conduit artery endothelial function. The traditional approaches to FMD calculation assess diameter change at arbitrary time points after occluding cuff deflation. The aim of this study was to examine the time course of brachial artery FMD after a 5-minute period of forearm ischemia in 12 young, 12 fitness matched older and 12 older untrained subjects. Edge-detection and wall tracking of high resolution B-mode arterial ultrasound images, combined with synchronized Doppler waveform envelope analysis, were used to calculate brachial artery diameter, blood flow, and shear rate continuously across the cardiac cycle after forearm ischemia. FMD was significantly higher in young healthy subjects (7.8±3.2%) compared with sedentary older subjects (5.2±2.8%, P<0.05) but not trained older subjects (6.4±2.3%). Time to peak diameter differed between young (50±11 seconds) and both older groups (trained; 80±21, P<0.001; sedentary: 83±36 seconds, P<0.001). A large proportion (>42%) of true peak diameters fell outside the time frames typically used to assess FMD in the literature. When calculated according to the commonly used approach, ie, 60 secs after cuff deflation, FMD was significantly lower compared with true peak FMD in all groups (P<0.001), and no differences were evident between the groups. The time course of FMD differs significantly between young and older subjects. Studies assuming that peak dilation occurs at an arbitrary time point, or within limited time windows, may draw misleading conclusions regarding differences between groups. More sophisticated approaches to measurement of FMD are required if it is to be considered a valid biomarker of vascular disease.

Key Words: blood flow • arterial diameter • high-resolution ultrasound • doppler • shear rate