| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2008;51:1103.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
Go Red Original Articles |
From the Department of Nephrology (I.O., S.E.K.), Ullevaal University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University of Oslo (I.O.), Oslo, Norway; Ohio State University (V.F.), Columbus; University of Alabama at Birmingham (S.O.); University of Michigan (S.E.K.), Ann Arbor; Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra (K.M., B.D.), Gothenburg, Sweden; Weill Cornell Medical College (R.B.D., P.M.O.), New York, NY; Institute of Medicine (E.G.), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Department of Heart Disease (E.G.), Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; and Merck Research Laboratories (D.A.H., P.A.L.), Upper Gwynedd, Pa.
Correspondence to Ingrid Os, Department of Nephrology, Ullevaal University Hospital, 0407 Oslo, Norway. E-mail ingrid.os{at}medisin.uio.no
Hypertension is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and outcomes in women. These posthoc analyses from the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study evaluated losartan- versus atenolol-based therapy on the primary composite end point of cardiovascular death, stroke, and myocardial infarction and other end points in 4963 women. Fewer events occurred in women versus men. Women in the losartan group had significant reductions in the primary end point (215 [18.2 per 1000 patient-years] versus 261 [22.5 per 1000 patient-years]; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.82 [95% CI: 0.68 to 0.98]; P=0.031), stroke (109 versus 154; HR: 0.71 [95% CI: 0.55 to 0.90]; P=0.005), total mortality (HR: 0.77 [95% CI: 0.63 to 0.95]; P=0.014), and new-onset diabetes (HR: 0.75 [95% CI: 0.59 to 0.94]; P=0.015) versus the atenolol group, with no between-treatment difference for myocardial infarction (HR: 1.02 [95% CI: 0.74 to 1.39]; P=0.925), cardiovascular mortality (HR: 0.86 [95% CI: 0.64 to 1.14]; P=0.282), or hospitalization for heart failure (HR: 0.94 [95% CI: 0.68 to 1.28]; P=0.677). More women in the losartan group required hospitalization for angina (HR: 1.70 [95% CI: 1.16 to 2.51]; P=0.007). Risk reductions for the primary composite end point, stroke, total mortality, and new-onset diabetes were significantly greater with losartan- versus atenolol-based treatment in women with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy in the LIFE study. The risk reductions for losartan, along with the tests for the interaction of treatment and gender, indicated that the treatment effect was consistent in men and women for all of the end points tested, with the exception of hospitalization for angina.
Key Words: gender hypertension left ventricular hypertrophy outcomes
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. J. Campbell Can the Study of Female Rats Help Our Understanding of Women? Hypertension, December 1, 2008; 52(6): e142 - e142. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Sampson, K. M. Moritz, E. S. Jones, R. E. Widdop, and K. M. Denton Response to Can the Study of Female Rats Help Our Understanding of Women? Hypertension, December 1, 2008; 52(6): e143 - e143. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Agabiti-Rosei and M. Salvetti Gender Differences in the Regression of Electrocardiographic Left Ventricular Hypertrophy During Antihypertensive Therapy Hypertension, July 1, 2008; 52(1): 59 - 60. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Escobar and V. Barrios Gender Differences in Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Regression Hypertension, June 1, 2008; 51(6): e58 - e58. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Os, R. B. Devereux, and P. M. Okin Response to Gender Differences in Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Regression Hypertension, June 1, 2008; 51(6): e59 - e59. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |