| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2008;51:1476.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Articles |
From the Clinical Pharmacology Unit (C.M.M., Y., S.M.W., C.V.W., I.B.W.), University of Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge; and the Department of Cardiology (B.M., M.M., J.R.C.), University of Cardiff, University Hospital, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Correspondence to Carmel M. McEniery, Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hospital Box 110, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, United Kingdom. E-mail cmm41{at}cam.ac.uk
Pulse pressure varies throughout the arterial tree, resulting in a gradient between central and peripheral pressure. Factors such as age, heart rate, and height influence this gradient. However, the relative impact of cardiovascular risk factors and atheromatous disease on central pressure and the normal variation in central pressure in healthy individuals are unclear. Seated peripheral (brachial) and central (aortic) blood pressures were assessed, and the ratio between aortic and brachial pulse pressure (pulse pressure ratio, ie, 1/amplification) was calculated in healthy individuals, diabetic subjects, patients with cardiovascular disease, and in individuals with only 1 of the following: hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, or smoking. The age range was 18 to 101 years, and data from 10 613 individuals were analyzed. Compared with healthy individuals, pulse pressure ratio was significantly increased (ie, central systolic pressure was relatively higher) in individuals with risk factors or disease (P<0.01 for all of the comparisons). Although aging was associated with an increased pulse pressure ratio, there was still an average±SD difference between brachial and aortic systolic pressure of 11±4 and 8±3 mm Hg for men and women aged >80 years, respectively. Finally, stratifying individuals by brachial pressure revealed considerable overlap in aortic pressure, such that >70% of individuals with high-normal brachial pressure had similar aortic pressures as those with stage 1 hypertension. These data demonstrate that cardiovascular risk factors affect the pulse pressure ratio, and that central pressure cannot be reliably inferred from peripheral pressure. However, assessment of central pressure may improve the identification and management of patients with elevated cardiovascular risk.
Key Words: central pressure brachial pressure pulse pressure ratio pulse pressure amplification hypertension cardiovascular risk factors
Related Article:
Hypertension 2008 51: 1470-1471.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Segers, D. Mahieu, E. R. Rietzschel, M. L. De Buyzere, and L. M. Van Bortel Impact of Radial Artery Pressure Waveform Calibration on Estimated Central Pressure Using a Transfer Function Approach Hypertension, September 1, 2008; 52(3): e24 - e25. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. McEniery, J. R. Cockcroft, and I. B. Wilkinson Response to Impact of Radial Artery Pressure Waveform Calibration on Estimated Central Pressure Using a Transfer Function Approach Hypertension, September 1, 2008; 52(3): e26 - e26. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Avolio Central Aortic Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Risk: A Paradigm Shift? Hypertension, June 1, 2008; 51(6): 1470 - 1471. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |