Hypertension. 2008;52:1-9
Published online before print May 22, 2008,
doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.189011
(Hypertension. 2008;52:1.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
|
AHA/ASH/PCNA Scientific Statements |
Call to Action on Use and Reimbursement for Home Blood Pressure Monitoring: Executive Summary
A Joint Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association, American Society of Hypertension, and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association
Thomas G. Pickering, MD, DPhil, FAHA, Chair;
Nancy Houston Miller, RN, BSN, FAHA;
Gbenga Ogedegbe, MD, MPH, FAHA;
Lawrence R. Krakoff, MD, FAHA;
Nancy T. Artinian, PhD, RN, BC, FAHA;
David Goff, MD, PhD, FAHA
Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) overcomes many of the
limitations of traditional office blood pressure (BP) measurement
and is both cheaper and easier to perform than ambulatory BP
monitoring. Monitors that use the oscillometric method are currently
available that are accurate, reliable, easy to use, and relatively
inexpensive. An increasing number of patients are using them
regularly to check their BP at home, but although this has been
endorsed by national and international guidelines, detailed
recommendations for their use have been lacking. There is a
rapidly growing literature showing that measurements taken by
patients at home are often lower than readings taken in the
office and closer to the average BP recorded by 24-hour ambulatory
monitors, which is the BP that best predicts cardiovascular
risk. Because of the larger numbers of readings that can be
taken by HBPM than in the office and the elimination of the
white-coat effect (the increase of BP during an office visit),
home readings are more reproducible than office readings and
show better correlations with measures of target organ damage.
In addition, prospective studies that have used multiple home
readings to express the true BP have found that home BP predicts
risk better than office BP (class IIa; level of evidence A).
This call-to-action article makes the following recommendations:
(1) It is recommended that HBPM should become a routine component
of BP measurement in the majority of patients with known or
suspected hypertension; (2) Patients should be advised to purchase
oscillometric monitors that measure BP on the upper arm with
an appropriate cuff size and that have been shown to be accurate
according to standard international protocols. They should be
shown how to use them by their healthcare providers; (3) Two
to 3 readings should be taken while the subject is resting in
the seated position, both in the morning and at night, over
a period of 1 week. A total of

12 readings are recommended for
making clinical decisions; (4) HBPM is indicated in patients
with newly diagnosed or suspected hypertension, in whom it may
distinguish between white-coat and sustained hypertension. If
the results are equivocal, ambulatory BP monitoring may help
to establish the diagnosis; (5) In patients with prehypertension,
HBPM may be useful for detecting masked hypertension; (6) HBPM
is recommended for evaluating the response to any type of antihypertensive
treatment and may improve adherence; (7) The target HBPM goal
for treatment is <135/85 mm Hg or <130/80 mm Hg in high-risk
patients; (8) HBPM is useful in the elderly, in whom both BP
variability and the white-coat effect are increased; (9) HBPM
is of value in patients with diabetes, in whom tight BP control
is of paramount importance; (10) Other populations in whom HBPM
may be beneficial include pregnant women, children, and patients
with kidney disease; and (11) HBPM has the potential to improve
the quality of care while reducing costs and should be reimbursed.
(Hypertension. 2008;52:1-9.)
Key Words: AHA Scientific Statements blood pressure hypertension patients
Find additional patient-related information at:
-
Read a summary of this article at americanheart.org
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
Homing in on Blood Pressure Monitoring
Journal Watch (General),
June 24, 2008;
2008(624):
2 - 2.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|