This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Data Supplement All Versions of this Article: 54/6/1353    most recent HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.138750v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Google Scholar Articles by Yamamoto, K. Articles by Rakugi, H. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Yamamoto, K. Articles by Rakugi, H. Related Collections ACE/Angiotension receptors Smooth muscle proliferation and differentiation

(Hypertension. 2009;54:1353.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Articles

Telmisartan-Induced Inhibition of Vascular Cell Proliferation Beyond Angiotensin Receptor Blockade and Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor- Activation

Koichi Yamamoto; Mitsuru Ohishi; Christopher Ho; Theodore W. Kurtz; Hiromi Rakugi

From the Department of Geriatric Medicine (K.Y., M.O., H.R.), Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; Department of Laboratory Medicine (K.Y., C.H., T.W.K.), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif.

Correspondence to Koichi Yamamoto, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan. E-mail kyamamoto{at}geriat.med.osaka-u.ac.jp

We investigated the ability of angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor blockers with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)- agonist activity (telmisartan and irbesartan) and AT1 receptor blockers devoid of PPAR agonist activity (eprosartan and valsartan) to inhibit vascular cell proliferation studied in the absence of angiotensin II stimulation. Telmisartan and, to a lesser extent, irbesartan inhibited proliferation of human aortic vascular smooth muscle cells in a dose-dependent fashion, whereas eprosartan and valsartan did not. To investigate the role of PPAR in the antiproliferative effects of telmisartan, we studied genetically engineered NIH3T3 cells that express PPAR. Pioglitazone inhibited proliferation of NIH3T3 cells expressing PPAR but had little effect on control NIH3T3 cells that lack PPAR. In contrast, telmisartan inhibited proliferation equally in NIH3T3 with and without PPAR. Valsartan failed to inhibit proliferation of either cell line. In addition, telmisartan inhibited proliferation equally in aortic smooth muscle cells derived from mice with targeted knockout of PPAR in the smooth muscle and from control mice, whereas valsartan had no effect on cell proliferation. Telmisartan, but not valsartan, reduced phosphorylation of AKT but not extracellular signal–regulated kinase otherwise induced by exposure to serum of quiescent human smooth muscle cells, quiescent mice smooth muscle cells lacking PPAR, or quiescent Chinese hamster ovary-K1 cells lacking the AT1 receptor. In summary, the antiproliferative effects of telmisartan in the absence of exogenously supplemented angiotensin II involve more than just AT1 receptor blockade and do not require activation of PPAR. It might be postulated that inhibition of AKT activation is a mechanism mediating the antiproliferative effects of telmisartan, including in cells lacking AT1 receptors or PPAR.

Key Words: atherosclerosis • angiotensin type II receptor blocker • cell proliferation • PPAR • angiotensin II