Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1984;6:167-174

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fouad, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Textor, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fouad, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Textor, S. C.

Hypertension, Vol 6, 167-174, Copyright © 1984 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Hemodynamic and antihypertensive effects of the new oral angiotensin- converting-enzyme inhibitor MK-421 (enalapril)

FM Fouad, RC Tarazi, EL Bravo and SC Textor

The antihypertensive, hemodynamic, and humoral effects of the new converting-enzyme inhibitor enalapril (MK-421) were assessed by sequential studies during 3 months of uninterrupted treatment (20 mg twice daily) in 10 hypertensive patients. Six achieved good blood pressure (mean arterial pressure) control with enalapril alone (from 126 +/- 7.0 mm Hg pretreatment to 105 +/- 1.6 mm Hg at 3 months, p less than 0.05). The other four required the addition of diuretics (hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg orally twice daily) at different stages of follow-up, with resultant blood pressure control (128 +/- 9.6 mm Hg pretreatment to 113 +/- 1.9 mm Hg at 2 months after the addition of diuretics). Neither the acute nor long-term blood pressure response could be predicted from the pretreatment levels of plasma renin activity. The blood pressure reduction during enalapril therapy was characterized by a decrease in total peripheral resistance (53 +/- 2.5 U X M2 pretreatment to 38 +/- 3.0 U X M2 at 3 months, p less than 0.05) with no significant change in cardiac output or heart rate. This lack of reflex tachycardia could not be ascribed to baroceptor dysfunction since the response to head-up tilt (the increase in diastolic blood pressure, in heart rate, and in plasma catecholamines) was normal and not significantly different from pretreatment response. Average blood volume did not change (91% +/- 4.3% of normal in the pretreatment period to 93% +/- 2.9% after 3 months of therapy, p = NS) despite the significant lowering of arterial pressure with enalapril alone (n = 6).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
G. P. Reams and J. H. Bauer
Effect of Enalapril in Subjects With Hypertension Associated With Moderate to Severe Renal Dysfunction
Arch Intern Med, November 1, 1986; 146(11): 2145 - 2148.
[Abstract] [PDF]