Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1985;7:140-145

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Janowsky, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Huey, L. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Janowsky, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Huey, L. Y.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*PHYSOSTIGMINE

Hypertension, Vol 7, 140-145, Copyright © 1985 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Central cardiovascular effects of physostigmine in humans

DS Janowsky, SC Risch and LY Huey

Central cholinergic control of pulse rate and blood pressure has seldom been studied in humans. In the current study we contrasted the cardiovascular effects of the centrally acting cholinesterase inhibitor physostigmine, which increases central and peripheral acetylcholine levels, with those of saline placebo and with those of the non- centrally acting cholinesterase inhibitor neostigmine, which only increases peripheral acetylcholine levels. We found that physostigmine, in contrast to neostigmine and saline, caused significant and often profound increases in pulse rate and blood pressure levels in humans. Thus, we conclude that acetylcholine may have a role in central cardiovascular regulation in humans. We also found that administration of physostigmine may cause net increases in pulse of up to 74 beats/minute, systolic blood pressure increases of up to 50 mm Hg, and diastolic increases of up to 45 mm Hg. Such increases could be dangerous in elderly patients with concomitant cerebrovascular or coronary circulation disorders.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
A. Medina, N. Bodick, A. L. Goldberger, M. M. Mahon, and L. A. Lipsitz
Effects of Central Muscarinic-1 Receptor Stimulation on Blood Pressure Regulation
Hypertension, March 1, 1997; 29(3): 828 - 834.
[Abstract] [Full Text]