This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lappe, R. W. Articles by Brody, M. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lappe, R. W. Articles by Brody, M. J.

Hypertension, Vol 7, 216-222, Copyright © 1985 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Selective antagonism of humoral versus neural vasoconstrictor responses by nisoldipine

RW Lappe, KW Barron, JE Faber and MJ Brody

The effects of nisoldipine administration on vascular reactivity to humoral and neural vasoconstrictor stimuli were examined in the intact rat. For these experiments, rats were instrumented with miniaturized pulsed Doppler flow probes to allow continuous measurement of renal, mesenteric, and hindquarters blood flow. In conscious and anesthetized rats, intravenous doses of angiotensin II (75 and 150 ng/kg), norepinephrine (0.6 and 1.2 microgram/kg), and epinephrine (0.6 and 1.2 microgram/kg) caused dose-dependent increases in arterial pressure and renal and mesenteric vascular resistance. Nisoldipine (0.7 microgram/min) administration significantly attenuated (p less than 0.05) the pressor and regional vasoconstrictor actions of all three circulating pressor agents; however, nisoldipine infusion had little effect on neurally mediated regional vasoconstrictor responses elicited by electrical stimulation of the posterior hypothalamus or greater splanchnic nerve. These data indicate that nisoldipine depressed vascular responsiveness to humoral vasoconstrictor agents, while neural vasoconstrictor responses were unaffected. Thus nisoldipine appears to exert preferential antagonistic effects on humoral rather than on neural vasoconstrictor stimuli.