Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1986;8:859-865

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schulte, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Gotzen, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schulte, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Gotzen, R.

Hypertension, Vol 8, 859-865, Copyright © 1986 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Antihypertensive and metabolic effects of diltiazem and nifedipine

KL Schulte, WA Meyer-Sabellek, A Haertenberger, HM Thiede, L Roecker, A Distler and R Gotzen

The antihypertensive effect of diltiazem (180-270 mg/day) and nifedipine (40-60 mg/day) in slow-release forms was assessed over 8 weeks in a double-blind parallel study in 40 subjects with essential hypertension at rest and during exercise. Blood pressure was comparably reduced in both groups at rest as well as during exercise. The responder rates (greater than or equal to 10% reduction in diastolic blood pressure) after 8 weeks of therapy were 53% at rest and 75% during exercise in the diltiazem group and 78% and 50%, respectively, in the nifedipine group. Diltiazem decreased heart rate by 8% (p less than 0.01), while nifedipine did not affect it. As a consequence, myocardial oxygen consumption, as judged by the pressure-rate product, was reduced by diltiazem. Resting plasma norepinephrine levels were increased significantly after 8 weeks of diltiazem therapy. Plasma epinephrine, renin, aldosterone, glucose, insulin, and lactate and routine laboratory parameters were unchanged at the end of the study. No significant changes in total cholesterol and triglyceride levels were observed after 8 weeks. Whereas therapy with diltiazem resulted in an 8% fall in low density lipoprotein cholesterol after 8 weeks (p less than 0.05), nifedipine induced a drop in very low density lipoprotein cholesterol (p less than 0.05) after 8 weeks of therapy. We conclude that both diltiazem and nifedipine are effective antihypertensive agents lacking undesirable metabolic side effect. Diltiazem, however, had the advantage of lowering heart rate and myocardial oxygen consumption.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
W. B. Stason, C. H. Schmid, D. Niedzwiecki, G. W. Whiting, D. Luo, S. D. Ross, and T. C. Chalmers
Safety of Nifedipine in Patients With Hypertension : A Meta-Analysis
Hypertension, July 1, 1997; 30(1): 7 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
W. B. Stason, C. H. Schmid, D. Niedzwiecki, G. W. Whiting, D. Luo, S. D. Ross, and T. C. Chalmers
Safety of Nifedipine in Patients With Hypertension : A Meta-Analysis
Hypertension, July 1, 1997; 30 (1): 7 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text]