Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1987;9:132-138

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laurent, S.
Right arrow Articles by Schmitt, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Laurent, S.
Right arrow Articles by Schmitt, H.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH

Hypertension, Vol 9, 132-138, Copyright © 1987 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Opposite central cardiovascular effects of nifedipine and BAY k 8644 in anesthetized rats

S Laurent, X Girerd, D Tsoukaris-Kupfer, M Legrand, AM Huchet-Brisac and H Schmitt

The central cardiovascular effects of the calcium channel blocker nifedipine and the calcium channel activator BAY k 8644 were studied in anesthetized and ventilated normotensive Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) or spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Both drugs were administered in a 1.5-microliter volume into the lateral ventricle of the brain (i.c.v.) or into the cisterna magna (i.c.). The injection of vehicle alone (i.c. or i.c.v.) did not significantly change mean arterial pressure (MAP) or heart rate. Nifedipine (5 and 50 micrograms/kg) and BAY k 8644 (5 and 50 micrograms/kg) induced opposite effects on MAP when centrally injected. Nifedipine decreased MAP and induced a bradycardia (i.c.v.) or no change in heart rate (i.c.), and BAY k 8644 increased MAP without any significant change in heart rate (i.c. or i.c.v.). These effects were more marked with the highest dose of either drug. These effects seemed to be of central origin, since they were suppressed by ganglionic blockade by hexamethonium (100 mg/kg i.v.), whereas after hexamethonium the hypotensive and the hypertensive responses to intravenously injected nifedipine and BAY k 8644, respectively, were preserved. Bilateral vagotomy suppressed the bradycardia induced by i.c.v. administered nifedipine. Previously i.c.v. administered nifedipine (5 micrograms/kg) antagonized the pressor response to BAY k 8644 (5 micrograms/kg i.c.v.). Changes in MAP and heart rate were significantly more marked in SHR than in WKY. These results indicate that a calcium channel inhibitor and a calcium channel activator can modulate in opposite fashion central mechanisms involved in blood pressure control.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Learn. Mem.Home page
P. Busquet, A. Hetzenauer, M. J. Sinnegger-Brauns, J. Striessnig, and N. Singewald
Role of L-type Ca2+ channel isoforms in the extinction of conditioned fear
Learn. Mem., April 25, 2008; 15(5): 378 - 386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
B. S. Huang and F. H. H. Leenen
Sympathoinhibitory Effects of Central Nifedipine in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats on High Versus Regular Sodium Intake
Hypertension, January 1, 1999; 33(1): 32 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Uechi, K. Asai, N. Sato, and S. F. Vatner
Voltage-Dependent Calcium Channel Promoter Restores Baroreflex Sensitivity in Conscious Dogs With Heart Failure
Circulation, September 29, 1998; 98(13): 1342 - 1347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
R. Venuto, G. Brown, M. Schoenl, and G. Losonczy
Enhanced vascular effects of the Ca2+ channel agonist Bay K 8644 in pregnant rabbits
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2002; 282(4): R952 - R959.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]