| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on December 2, 2007
From the Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute (J.M.), Palo Alto, Calif; Program on Prevention Outcomes and Practices (R.S.S.), Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: maj{at}pamfri.org.
Abstract—Essential hypertension is the most common diagnosis in US primary care settings for middle-aged persons and seniors. Yet, data on hypertension screening, treatment, and control in such settings are limited. We analyzed National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data to examine the rates of and factors associated with hypertension screening, treatment, and control during US office visits in 2003 and 2004. Blood pressure was measured in 56% (95% confidence limits: 52% to 59%) of all visits by patients
Revised on December 18, 2007
Screening, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension in US Private Physician Offices, 2003–2004
Jun Ma* and Randall S. Stafford
18 years of age and in 93% (95% confidence limits: 89% to 96%) of hypertensive patient visits. Among the latter, 62% (95% confidence limits: 55% to 69%) were treated. Diuretics were the most commonly prescribed antihypertensive agents (46%; 95% confidence limits: 41% to 50%), and combination therapy was reported in 58% (95% confidence limits: 54% to 63%) of treated visits. Only 39% (95% confidence limits: 34% to 43%) of treated visits were at recommended blood pressure goals. The odds of not being screened for hypertension were notably greater for visits with a provider other than a primary care physician or cardiologist (10.0; 95% confidence limits: 5.5 to 16.7) and for nonwell care visits (5.6; 95% confidence limits: 3.6 to 8.3). Greater odds of not being treated for hypertension were noted by geographic region (South versus Northeast: 2.6; 95% confidence limits: 1.2 to 5.6) and visit type (first time versus return visits; 1.6; 95% confidence limits: 1.1 to 2.4). The odds of not having blood pressure controlled were greater for patients with comorbidities (1.6; 95% confidence limits: 1.1 to 2.4). In conclusion, more intervention efforts are needed to further reduce the gaps and variations in routine practice in relation to evidence-based practice guidelines for hypertension screening, treatment, and control.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Barton and M. R. Meyer Postmenopausal Hypertension: Mechanisms and Therapy Hypertension, July 1, 2009; 54(1): 11 - 18. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Petersen, L. D. Woodard, L. M. Henderson, T. H. Urech, and K. Pietz Will Hypertension Performance Measures Used for Pay-for-Performance Programs Penalize Those Who Care for Medically Complex Patients? Circulation, June 16, 2009; 119(23): 2978 - 2985. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. Wesson Is the Ethnic Disparity in CKD a Symptom of Dysfunctional Primary Care in the US? J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2008; 19(7): 1249 - 1251. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |