Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on June 1, 2009

Hypertension. 2009
Published online before print June 1, 2009, doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.133801
A more recent version of this article appeared on August 1, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
54/2/409    most recent
HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.133801v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mackenzie, I. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson, I. B.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mackenzie, I. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson, I. B.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*ATENOLOL
*BENDROFLUMETHIAZIDE
Medline Plus Health Information
*Blood Pressure Medicines
*High Blood Pressure
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Right arrow Clinical Studies

Submitted on March 30, 2009
Revised on April 14, 2009

Comparison of the Effects of Antihypertensive Agents on Central Blood Pressure and Arterial Stiffness in Isolated Systolic Hypertension

Isla S. Mackenzie; Carmel M. McEniery; Zahid Dhakam; Morris J. Brown; John R. Cockcroft; and Ian B. Wilkinson*

From the Clinical Pharmacology Unit (I.S.M., C.M.M., Z.D., M.J.B., I.B.W.), University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge; and Wales Heart Research Institute (J.R.C.), Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ibw20{at}cam.ac.uk.

Abstract—Isolated systolic hypertension is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease and results primarily from elastic artery stiffening. Although various drug therapies are used to lower peripheral blood pressure (BP) in patients with isolated systolic hypertension, the effects of the 4 major classes of antihypertensive agents on central BP, pulse pressure (PP) amplification, and arterial stiffness in this condition are not clear. Fifty-nine patients over the age of 60 years with untreated isolated systolic hypertension (systolic BP ≥140 mm Hg and diastolic BP ≤90 mm Hg) were randomly assigned to receive 1 of the following 4 antihypertensive agents: perindopril, atenolol, lercanidipine, or bendrofluazide. BP was measured using a mercury sphygmomanometer, and augmentation index and carotid-femoral (aortic) pulse wave velocity were measured at baseline, after 2 weeks of placebo therapy, and at the end of 10 weeks of active therapy. Peripheral systolic BP and peripheral PP were reduced similarly after treatment with all 4 classes of drug. However, central PP was only reduced significantly by perindopril, lercanidipine, and bendrofluazide, whereas atenolol had no effect. Lercanidipine reduced the augmentation index, whereas atenolol increased it. Aortic pulse wave velocity was not changed by any of the drugs. In summary, despite similar reductions in peripheral systolic and PPs with the 4 classes of drug, changes in central pressure and augmentation index varied. Because central PP and increased wave reflections are considered important risk factors in patients with isolated systolic hypertension, the choice of therapy may be influenced by these findings in the future.


Key words: antihypertensive therapy • central pressure • pulse pressure amplification • pulse wave velocity • isolated systolic hypertension




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
H. A. Struijker-Boudier, J. Blacher, B. I. Levy, and M. E. Safar
Introduction to the Seventh International Workshop on Structure and Function of the Vascular System
Hypertension, August 1, 2009; 54(2): 373 - 374.
[Full Text] [PDF]