This Article Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Frohlich, E. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Frohlich, E. D.

(Hypertension. 2001;37:1198.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.

In Memoriam

Professor John Douglas Swales

Edward D. Frohlich, MD¹

¹ Editor-in-Chief

	Introduction

 
With profound sadness and with almost palpable shock, I was deeply disturbed when several of Professor John Swales’ colleagues notified me of his sudden and tragic death. The field of hypertension is small, and most of us, who have derived much excitement cultivating its crops of new information, have come to know one another fairly well. And, so it was that I developed and valued John’s friendship, his thinking about the new and old information, and our discussions on Medicine in its broadest sense.

At one meeting we shared our concerns about these scientific publications re-inventing old concepts. It was this concern that prompted one of my earlier editorials,¹ which was elaborated by Professors Williams, Heagerty, Samani, and Thurston in their accompanying In Memoriam.² John truly enjoyed "re-searching" the extant literature, a pastime that I thoroughly enjoyed sharing with him. How unfortunate that more workers today fail to share John Swales’ interest and commitment!

In one such conversation with John Swales, we spoke of our frustration and concern about those who are responsible for the political aspects of scientific research. He had recently completed his "stint" directing the National Heath Service Research and Development Program for the United Kingdom. I was deeply moved by his discussion and thinking, and I invited him to formalize his thoughts in an editorial for Hypertension. His very important message was published last year,³ with my accompanying complementary notation about John and his philosophies.⁴ Shortly after publication of his message, John sent a . . . [Full Text of this Article]