Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2002;39:e27-e28
doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000017852.34860.8F
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schuijt, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Siragy, H. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schuijt, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Siragy, H. M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH

(Hypertension. 2002;39:e27.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.


Letters to the Editor

No Net Effect of Angiotensin II on Blood Pressure?

Martin P. Schuijt; Pramod R. Saxena; A.H. Jan Danser

Department of Pharmacology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

To the Editor:

With great interest we read the recent study by Carey et al1 on angiotensin (Ang) II type 2 receptor (AT2) receptor–mediated hypotension in anesthetized and conscious rats. These data oppose our findings on the lack of AT2 receptor–mediated systemic hemodynamic effects in anesthetized rats.2 To explain this discrepancy, Carey et al propose that the doses of the Ang II type 1 (AT1) and AT2 receptor antagonists used in our study (irbesartan and PD123319, respectively) were insufficient to unmask AT2 receptor–mediated vasodilation. However, the same doses were high enough to observe AT2 receptor–mediated vasodilation in the rat coronary vascular bed.3 Furthermore, the dose of irbesartan that we used was high enough to fully block the Ang II–induced vasoconstrictor effects in our study, as well as in studies by others.4 Moreover, the PD123319 dose that we used is known to result in micromolar concentrations in blood plasma,5 ie, concentrations that are high enough to selectively block AT2 receptors. Higher doses lead to concentrations that also interfere with AT1 receptors.5

Carey et al mention that AT2 receptors in the adult rat are present in low copy compared with AT1 receptors. In agreement with this concept, exogenous Ang II induces vasoconstriction in the absence of AT receptor blockers, and AT1 receptor blockade with either losartan or valsartan results in vasodilation. Unfortunately, the authors did not study the effect of PD123319 alone. If, indeed, Ang II normally has a net vasoconstrictor effect, based on the much larger density of AT1 receptors compared with . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Robert M. Carey; Nancy L. Howell; Xiao-Hong Jin; Helmy M. Siragy

University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia