Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2002;40:601-603
Published online before print September 30, 2002, doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000035857.73890.67
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/5/601    most recent
01.HYP.0000035857.73890.67v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Egan, B. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Egan, B. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Primary prevention
Right arrow Other hypertension
Right arrow Epidemiology

(Hypertension. 2002;40:601.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorial Commentary

Nonnarcotic Analgesic Use and the Risk of Hypertension in US Women

Brent M. Egan

From the Medical University of South Carolina, Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, Charleston, SC.

Correspondence to Brent M. Egan, MD, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, Charleston, SC 29425. E-mail eganbm@musc.edu


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 


*    Introduction
 
"Nonnarcotic Analgesic Use and the Risk of Hypertension in US Women"1 presents epidemiological observations that are intriguing and have potentially important public health and clinical implications. The high prevalence and incidence of hypertension in this comparatively healthy (nurses) cohort of middle-aged and older women 44 to 69 years of age was substantial. The prevalence of hypertension at baseline was 32%. The incidence of hypertension among the women who were normotensive in 1990 and followed an average of {approx}7.4 years (381 078 person yr/51,630 persons) was an impressive 20.5% (51 630/10 579) or {approx}2.8% annually. The relatively high incidence of hypertension occurred despite the fact that 50% of these women had a reported body mass index of <=24 kg/m2, whereas {approx}60% of Americans in this age range have a body mass index >25 kg/m2.

The high rate of analgesic use was also noteworthy. Eighty-five percent of women provided information on their use of 1 of 3 analgesics, including aspirin, acetaminophen, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Seventy percent of the sample reported using at least 1 of these 3 analgesics 1 or more days monthly. Self-reported use on a monthly basis was of similar magnitude for aspirin (44%), acetaminophen (43%), and NSAIDs (37%).

A striking and novel observation in this report is the positive and consistent association between the frequency of use for all 3 classes of analgesics and the relative risk of hypertension after controlling for multiple confounders in the multivariate model. The Table represents one clinician’s attempt to . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. T. Chan, J. E. Manson, C. M. Albert, C. U. Chae, K. M. Rexrode, G. C. Curhan, E. B. Rimm, W. C. Willett, and C. S. Fuchs
Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs, Acetaminophen, and the Risk of Cardiovascular Events
Circulation, March 28, 2006; 113(12): 1578 - 1587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
J. P. Forman, M. J. Stampfer, and G. C. Curhan
Non-Narcotic Analgesic Dose and Risk of Incident Hypertension in US Women
Hypertension, September 1, 2005; 46(3): 500 - 507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal Watch CardiologyHome page
Analgesic Use and Hypertension Risk in Women
Journal Watch Cardiology, January 31, 2003; 2003(131): 5 - 5.
[Full Text]