| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2005;45:485.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Editorial Commentaries |
From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical School, Tochigi, Japan.
Correspondence to Kazuomi Kario, MD, PhD, FACP, FACC, FAHA, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical School, 3311-1, Yakushiji, Minamikawachi, Kawachi, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan. E-mail kkario@jichi.ac.jp
An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract. |
Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) exhibits significant diurnal variation with modification of various psychological and physical stimulations during daily living.1 There is a consensus that the average ambulatory BP levels over 24 hours are more closely associated with hypertensive target organ damage and cardiovascular event than clinical BP.2 In addition, exaggerated ambulatory BP variation may be important in addition to the average BP level. However, results of previous studies that attempted to demonstrate the association between BP variability and cardiovascular disease are inconsistent. Some studies have found that ambulatory BP variability is a significant and independent determinant of target organ damage and poor cardiovascular prognosis,3,4 whereas others have not found an independent association.5 The reason for these inconsistent results is partly the modification of diurnal BP variation. Abnormal diurnal BP variation, such as marked nocturnal BP falls (extreme dippers) or the exaggerated morning BP surge, and reverse diurnal BP variation patterns with higher sleep BP than awake BP (risers) are risks for target organ damage and cardiovascular events.68 These phenotypes of ambulatory BP variability are associated partly with each other and with 24-hour ambulatory BP variability. Abnormal diurnal BP variability is associated with other relatively shorter BP variability, such as orthostatic BP variabilities in elderly hypertensives.
In this issue, Zakopoulos et al newly introduce time rate of BP variation,9 which is a measure of speed of BP variation, to evaluate the effect of BP variability components on target organ damage. They found the steeper BP variability, which is greater in hypertensives
Related Article:
Hypertension 2005 45: 505-512.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. G. Pickering, N. H. Miller, G. Ogedegbe, L. R. Krakoff, N. T. Artinian, and D. Goff Call to Action on Use and Reimbursement for Home Blood Pressure Monitoring: A Joint Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association, American Society of Hypertension, and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association Hypertension, July 1, 2008; 52(1): 10 - 29. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Grassi, F. Quarti-Trevano, and G. Mancia Review: Cardioprotective effects of telmisartan in uncomplicated and complicated hypertension Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, June 1, 2008; 9(2): 66 - 74. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Marfella, M. Siniscalchi, M. Portoghese, C. Di Filippo, F. Ferraraccio, C. Schiattarella, B. Crescenzi, P. Sangiuolo, G. Ferraro, S. Siciliano, et al. Morning Blood Pressure Surge as a Destabilizing Factor of Atherosclerotic Plaque: Role of Ubiquitin-Proteasome Activity Hypertension, April 1, 2007; 49(4): 784 - 791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. Kaplan Treatment of Hypertension: Remaining Issues After the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial Hypertension, January 1, 2006; 47(1): 10 - 13. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gus, E. Dolan, A. Stanton, E. O'Brien, and J. A. Staessen Superiority of Ambulatory Over Clinic Blood Pressure Measurement Hypertension, October 1, 2005; 46(4): e11 - e12. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |