| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 2006;47:327.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.
Editorial Commentaries |
From the INSERM U684 (A.B., P.L.), Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy; Centre de Gériatrie (A.B.), CHU of Nancy, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy; and Université Henri Poincaré (P.L.), Faculté de Médecine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Correspondence to Athanase Benetos, MD, PhD, Centre de Gériatrie CHU of Nancy, 54511 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France. E-mail a.benetos@chu-nancy.fr
An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract. |
The articles by Li et al1 and Dolan et al,2 in this issue of Hypertension and focused on the development of a new approach to estimate arterial stiffness, highlight the role of arterial mechanical properties in the determination of cardiovascular risk.
In the past, arterial stiffening and increases in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and pulse pressure (PP) have been considered a part of normal aging, and no treatment for these alterations has been proposed. The pathophysiology, structural bases, and determinants of arterial stiffness have been extensively studied these last years.35 Although arterial stiffening is a common situation, it has now been confirmed that aortic stiffness is an independent predictor for total and cardiovascular mortality, coronary morbiditymortality, and fatal stroke in patients with essential hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or end-stage renal failure, and in the general population in the elderly.6,7 It is therefore important to identify subjects who are at higher risk for developing arterial stiffness with aging and determine the environmental and genetic factors that can accelerate arterial stiffening.
In recent years, several devices have been developed for the evaluation and measurement of arterial stiffness. Arterial stiffness can be quantified by the measurement of several parameters such as cross-sectional arterial distensibility and compliance, pulse wave velocity (PWV), analysis of pulse wave contours (mainly augmentation index and reflection waves), measurements of elastic modulus, stress-strain relationships, etc. During the past 5 years, among these approaches, PWV and augmentation index (AI) have become the most reliable for the evaluation of arterial stiffness in clinical
Related Articles:
Hypertension 2006 47: 359-364.
Hypertension 2006 47: 365-370.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Palmas, T. G. Pickering, J. Teresi, J. E. Schwartz, A. Moran, R. S. Weinstock, and S. Shea Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring and All-Cause Mortality in Elderly People With Diabetes Mellitus Hypertension, February 1, 2009; 53(2): 120 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Schillaci, G. Parati, M. Pirro, G. Pucci, M. R. Mannarino, L. Sperandini, and E. Mannarino Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index Is Not a Specific Marker of Reduced Arterial Compliance Hypertension, May 1, 2007; 49(5): 986 - 991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Westerhof, J.-W. Lankhaar, and B. E. Westerhof Letter to the Editor: Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index Is Not a Stiffness Parameter But a Ventriculo-Arterial Coupling Factor Hypertension, February 1, 2007; 49(2): e7 - e7. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. O'Brien Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement: A Trove of Hidden Gems? Hypertension, September 1, 2006; 48(3): 364 - 365. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2006 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |