Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2006;47:1051
Published online before print May 8, 2006, doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000223025.17605.3c
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
47/6/1051    most recent
01.HYP.0000223025.17605.3cv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spence, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spence, J. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Right arrow Cerebrovascular disease/stroke
Right arrow Other Stroke Treatment - Medical
Right arrow Other Stroke

(Hypertension. 2006;47:1051.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorial Commentaries

Treating Hypertension in Acute Stroke

A Better Arrow for the Quiver

J. David Spence

From the Stroke Prevention and Atherosclerosis Research Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.

Correspondence to David Spence, Stroke Prevention and Atherosclerosis Research Centre, 1400 Western Rd, London, Ontario, Canada N6G 2V2. E-mail dspence@robarts.ca


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

There has been a longstanding controversy about whether high blood pressure should be treated in the setting of acute stroke.1,2 Normally, cerebral blood flow is maintained through a wide range of systemic mean arterial blood pressure, from &50 to 150 mm Hg.3,4 In the setting of cerebral ischemia (and probably also in the zone of injury around intracerebral hemorrhages), the ischemic zone partially loses autoregulation, so cerebral blood flow in that region becomes dependent on perfusion pressure.5 Many experts, therefore, recommended that blood pressure elevation, which is common in the setting of acute stroke, not be treated for fear of exacerbating stroke by reducing perfusion pressure and thereby reducing flow in the compromised but viable ischemic penumbra.

Because swelling in the region of ischemia raises tissue pressure, the cerebral perfusion pressure falls below systemic blood pressure, and it was thought that higher pressures might be beneficial. However, this is a double-edged sword, because pressures that are too high increase edema, leading to progressive infarction, causing tissue pressure to rise progressively, and reducing perfusion pressure farther and farther below systemic blood pressure. There is, therefore, a case for regulating blood pressure to an optimal level that maintains cerebral perfusion while minimizing exacerbation of edema. This may become possible through the recent development of methods to evaluate cerebral blood flow through widely available computerized tomography technology.6

Furthermore, as Del Maestro and I pointed out in 1985,2 there are some circumstances in which the blood pressure must be treated, despite the occurrence of . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
J. D. Spence
Treating Hypertension in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Hypertension, October 1, 2009; 54(4): 702 - 703.
[Full Text] [PDF]